The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1432 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I am certainly content that you fulfilled your responsibility, Jackie. I return to you, Edward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
James Adams, on a slightly different point in the evidence, my understanding is that you would like to ensure that electronic polling cards could be brought in in the future. Is there a reason why we should not bring in electronic polling cards, along with physical polling cards, at the moment? What would be the advantages of electronic polling cards?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, at the very least, it is a good proposal for a pilot.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I apologise, but I just want to come in on the previous point. You say that there is not much research on digital imprints, but in other democracies—I am thinking of the US—the requirement for a candidate to affirm a message that is put out to the public has existed for a lot longer. Is there research in the US on the effect of that endorsement? Are you aware of any effect? If so, is it good or bad?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. I am sorry, Ivan.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I want to come back on registration. We have talked about being registered. For how long should someone stay on the register?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I do not mean to cut across you, but we will come to that specific issue, because I know that you have valuable evidence on that. We are trying to explore the bill in manageable chunks, so we are looking at disqualification at the moment, but we absolutely will come to the issue that you mentioned. I am more than happy for you to write to us afterwards on the point about intimidation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting in 2024 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. We have received apologies from Oliver Mundell MSP; Edward Mountain joins us today as his substitute.
Our first agenda item is a decision on whether to take in private agenda item 3, which is consideration of the evidence heard on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill. Are members happy to consider that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will bring in Ivan McKee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I have a question for Ahlam Hamoud Al-Bashiri. One of the things that has been raised with us is the fact that, when an MSP is elected, they have to take an oath of allegiance. Do you see any potential challenges from an individual’s point of view in taking that oath of allegiance? Are there perhaps any unforeseen consequences that we have not considered yet about requiring that of a new MSP who has gone through the entire election process and succeeded, particularly if they have refugee status and so on?