The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
DCI Chisholm, would you like to add anything else?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
I assume that Police Scotland, through the chief constable, takes full responsibility for the notification enforcement and requirements, and that the overseas court would have nothing to do with that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
The other bodies that are involved in MAPPA, especially the health bodies, have other obligations that relate to the care of the individual—indeed, they have very strong obligations to undertake certain actions. That is completely separate from the SONR stuff. We are simply talking about people’s best endeavours with regard to notification so that everyone is aware of an individual’s risk profile because, at the end of the day, MAPPA is about protecting the public from the specific risks that someone might present. It is not a sentence; it is about how an individual can remain in the community, while being monitored appropriately to a level that provides reassurance to the public that, as far as possible, they are safe. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
So, MAPPA is the best vehicle for sharing data to ensure that the various appropriate bodies are aware of those individuals who come under the notification scheme, know their location and know what support is needed. However, nothing under MAPPA removes from the chief constable the administrative obligations that exist under SONR. Those remain with the chief constable, although they delegate them, as you have said. Therefore, the final responsibility with regard to matters such as the indefinite period still rests with Police Scotland and the chief constable.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, although the wording “indefinite period” is used, the period of time that an individual spends under the notification is reviewed and, if the individual remains in a notification situation, it is because the police have reviewed the situation and assessed that individual as posing a continuing risk.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
What test do the police use to decide whether the notification period should come to an end? Is a set of tests applied?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Under the notification system, the interaction between the police and the individual in front of them is a bespoke—to use your word—process.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Under a civil order, once the formal notification is made, the individual is required, as you said, to notify the police of their name, address and various other details, and to keep that information up to date if circumstances change. Are the police made aware in any other way of individuals who should update the register, or is the obligation on the individual?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
For the purposes of the bill, we are looking at registration. Registration could have been occasioned through a civil case, which involves a different burden of proof and such things, but Police Scotland would treat individuals who were subject to notification requirements in exactly the same way, irrespective of why the notification arose. Does that make sense?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is a parallel of chief constables’ responsibility to review indefinite notification requirements and to actively remove orders that cease to be needed. If a chief constable chooses not to remove an order, the decision could still be sent for review to a sheriff at the request of the individual to whom the order applies.