The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
To go back to the bill, one question that keeps returning to us is about someone who presents for election but is in the notification system. A person who proposes themselves for election has an individual responsibility to sign a declaration, and it is already a criminal offence if that is incorrectly done. How challenging would it be for Police Scotland, if it was presented with an individual’s details, to see whether they were in the notification system? I am not talking about making a judgment on whether the person can or cannot stand, but would Police Scotland be able to say to, for example, a returning officer or another relevant person, whether an individual was subject to notification requirements? How challenging would it be for the police to check that, if you were presented with a name and address?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
So, in effect, rather than a register, the database and MAPPA allow for the pooling of the information, irrespective of someone’s location and which agency is the lead agency in respect of the individual.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, appearing on the register is not actually part of the sentence; it is something that flows as a result of the conviction or, indeed, the judge deciding, in limited cases, that the offending has a sexual element and that the individual should be on the register.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
You used the acronym MAPPA, which has appeared in chunks of our evidence. Would you like to explain what that is, rather than who it is?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will explore that in a bit more detail. Some notifications arise from a criminal conviction under schedule 3, as you described, but sexual risk orders are also civil orders. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
I thank you for that—that is exactly one of the purposes of bringing experts in to give evidence. I thank you, your colleagues and Police Scotland generally.
I now move the meeting into private session.
10:04 Meeting continued in private until 11:02.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is what I was going to ask about. Therefore, there would have to be additional evidence that related to the period after the issuing of the first order, and common sense says that, if there was not that evidence, it is unlikely that that would be pursued, unless there was a very cunning reason for that. However, it would be the subsequent behaviour that would be looked at by the courts and, if it was appropriate, that would come under the new scheme of notification.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
If the decision is taken not to discharge those orders, those would continue. In that case, would the individual then have a right—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, it would be helpful for the committee to contact the Scottish Government to ask for clarification in respect of the statement that all SOPOs and RoSHOs will finish on 31 March 2028 and to ask when they will actually finish.