The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, and welcome to today’s proceedings.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
Today, the committee is looking at the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill at stage 2. I will briefly explain the procedure that we will adopt. Members should have a copy of the bill, the marshalled list and the groupings. For anyone who is observing, I note that those documents are available on the bill’s web page on the Scottish Parliament website.
I will call each amendment individually, in the order in which it appears on the marshalled list, at which point the member who lodged it should either move it or say “Not moved”. If that member does not move the amendment, any other member who is present may do so.
The groupings set out the amendments in the order in which they will be debated. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. In each debate, I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in the group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all the other amendments in the group. I will then call other members with amendments in the group to speak to but not to move their amendments and to speak to the other amendments in the group if they so wish. I will then call any other members present who wish to speak in the debate. Members who wish to speak should indicate that by catching my or my clerk’s attention. I will then call the minister, if he has not already spoken in the debate.
Finally, I will call the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up and to indicate whether he or she wishes to press the amendment or withdraw it. If the amendment is pressed, I will put the question on the amendment. If a member wishes to withdraw an amendment after it has been moved and debated, I will ask whether any member who is present objects. If there is an objection, I will immediately put the question on the amendment.
Later amendments in a group are not debated again when they are reached. If they are moved, I will put the question on them straight away. If there is a division, only committee members are entitled to vote, and voting is by a show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands raised clearly until the clerk has recorded their names. If there is a tie, I will exercise a casting vote. My policy will be to use my casting vote against any amendment.
The committee is also required to consider and decide on each section, the schedule to the bill and the long title, and I will put the question on each of those provisions at the appropriate time.
I will not open that up for questions but will commence by calling the first grouping of amendments.
Before section 1
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
Amendment 57, in the name of Ross Greer, is grouped with amendment 68.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
I invite Ross Greer to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 57.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
I would be grateful if we could return to your amendments.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 2, Abstentions 1. The vote is tied. My casting vote is against.
Amendment 60 disagreed to.
Section 3 agreed to.
Schedule agreed to.
After section 3
Amendment 61 not moved.
Sections 4 to 6 agreed to.
Section 7—Effect of order: Scottish Parliament
Amendment 10 moved—[Jamie Hepburn]—and agreed to.
Section 7, as amended, agreed to.
Section 8—Effect of order: local government
Amendment 11 moved—[Jamie Hepburn]—and agreed to.
Section 8, as amended, agreed to.
Sections 9 to 11 agreed to.
After section 11
Amendment 62 not moved.
Section 12—Persons holding office: temporary relief from effect of disqualification
Amendments 12 to 19 moved—[Jamie Hepburn]—and agreed to.
Section 12, as amended, agreed to.
After section 12
Amendment 20 moved—[Jamie Hepburn].
Amendments 20A and 20B not moved.
Amendment 20 agreed to.
Sections 13 and 14 agreed to.
Section 15—Third parties capable of giving notification
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Do members have any other questions or comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Yes—that makes sense.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
Just for confirmation, that is the letter from the Scottish Government to the committee in which it outlines its thinking on amendments that it might lodge.
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. Referring back to the individualised way in which the matter is dealt with, it all sits on a risk assessment of those individuals that is made for the public. It is quite reassuring to hear that, even without some formal things happening, the risk that the public is being put at by that individual is already assessed, as you say, by Police Scotland and the other lead agencies.