Seòmar agus comataidhean

Were any ideas considered but then discounted? I know that there was the ability to hold the election over a few days, which you have explained, but was there anything else?

I welcome Louise Edwards.

Would Louise Edwards like to take that question on time limits?

Malcolm, I do not know whether you heard the question, but there are a number of surprised faces around the table.

Has any thought been given to retaining any of the additional elements that were put in place? For example, a number of people told me that they were thankful for the meet-and-greet element, because it made them feel easier about going in.

Once the witnesses have had time to consider that, it might be useful for them to write to the committee. As Bob Doris said, if there are gaps in the information, it would be useful to know that.

The turnout for the election was the highest of any Scottish Parliament election to date. Why was there that increase?

I am slightly conscious of the time, so I will jump to Alexander Stewart.

Absolutely. I have spoken to the clerk about my role as the convener, and I have indicated to a number of CPGs that I will not take part in them simply because of that role. That is not a requirement; it is just something that I feel would be beneficial, so that CPGs understand that there is an even-handedness.

Attendance at, and membership of, a CPG by any member of this committee is perfectly fine. I think that it is good practice to point out—exactly as you have, Paul—when you have a specific interest in something that is before us, but that certainly does not preclude your involvement in the discussion.

I just want to get an answer on that. Are you saying that you are not aware of a situation in which a committee has said no to a proposed appointment?

Are you confident that the amended code will facilitate that if the intention is there?