The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1203 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
It seems to be a huge rise. There were 49 call-outs in the first three and a half months of 2025 alone. There has been a huge increase in the amount of call-outs in the time between when the prison was privately run and now, so it would be interesting to see whether there is a difference in the amount of drugs that are getting into HMP Kilmarnock now.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
In your submission, you said that the use of e-cigarettes or vapes is
“the contributing factor to the increase in drug taking in prisons”.
Are the drugs coming in via the vapes? You said that saturated items are coming into the prisons. Are individuals using the vapes to smoke them, or do the drugs actually come in with the vapes?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
So, the vapes are not actually coming in with drugs in them.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
So, you are saying that there needs to be earlier intervention in the community to stop such people going down the route of committing multiple offences, which makes retailers victims, given that such people commit multiple offences before they are eventually sent to prison.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
That would be good. Detective Chief Superintendent Higgins, do you want to comment on whether there are any penalties for someone who is caught sending in a drone or bringing drugs into prisons? Is a penalty or charge used as a deterrent? If there is no deterrent, people will continue to do it, so is something in place that prevents them from wanting to?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do you want to comment on that, Kirsten?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
You are saying that such a law would have a huge impact in increasing public awareness, but—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
However, the one thing that we do not want is to decrease prosecutions.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
I have a question for Liliana Torres Jiménez. Unlike the other two submissions that we have mentioned, yours says:
“We have a neutral view on the creation of a standalone offence of NFS.”
However, further on, it says:
“the allocation of appropriate resources is critical to ensure the enforcement of new provisions.”
Will you tell us a bit more about that? Is that comment made in the same vein as those that say that it will be harder to prove such an offence, which means that you will need a lot more resources—not just on the legal side but on the police side—to get a prosecution?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Sharon Dowey
In this morning’s evidence, we have heard how serious non-fatal strangulation is. However, in the submissions from Police Scotland and COPFS, we see a lot of concerns about the possible detrimental impacts and unintended consequences of bringing in a stand-alone offence of NFS. If the Scottish Government decided not to introduce a stand-alone offence, are other options available that could ensure that the behaviour is adequately addressed by the criminal justice system? Police Scotland’s submission mentions it being as an aggravating factor. What are your thoughts on adding an aggravating factor for existing offences?