The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1097 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
You said that in your earlier evidence—that, after 24 hours, they were a different person.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
You have covered some of my questions in your answers to Katy Clark, but I am also interested in the financial impact of GPS monitoring.
At the moment, the policy note accompanying the instrument says that there is a one-time cost of £210,000 for the roll-out of GPS monitoring and that the cost of information technology change will “fall to the Scottish Government”. It then says that G4S has GPS monitoring in its contract. It also says that only around 10 to 20 people will be monitored with GPS initially.
I want to get more detail on that. Does the cost refer to money that G4S has already been given? My concern is that that money has already been spent on other things, such as the radio frequency monitoring that G4S already does. We welcome the fact that people will be on GPS monitoring, and I am glad to see that being brought in. However, my concern is that, if G4S has already spent the money on other things, it will not do the GPS monitoring that is required. Does G4S have the capacity to do that monitoring?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
I have a quick question about prisoners serving a sentence that is not for domestic violence. Victims of domestic violence were concerned that their tormentor would be released but, because the offender was serving a sentence for a different offence, the victim would not be notified. Is there anything in your proposals that would ensure that those victims are not forgotten and that they will be notified if the person is released or released early?
10:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
Does the Government have an updated report that it could give us on any progress that has happened with the 22 recommendations in the report of the review? Which ones will require legislation? Can you tell us about any progress that you have already made on those recommendations that do not require legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
So, at the moment, you are just gathering your thoughts and working through a process; nothing has been put in place.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
In your news release in October, you said that you had already begun work on creating a victim contact team. What stage is the team at? How many members does it have? What kind of work has it been carrying out in the past couple of months?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
I was more interested to know what stage we are at with the team, how many people are in it and what it has done in the past couple of months.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
We do not need all the details just now, but if you could perhaps update us.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. I return to the report on the independent review of victim notification that was published in May 2023. It set out 22 recommendations, and it said that not all of them would require legislation. I was pleased to hear you say in your opening remarks that any legal changes would be the absolutely essential ones only. That is good, as we do not need legislation just for the sake of it.
You have also said that progressing the reforms is a priority, and that you wanted to do that at pace. The Government issued its response in October 2024, but the report was published in May 2023, which was 17 months earlier. If you are trying to work at pace, why did it take so long for the Government to issue a response?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
I am trying to establish what practical measures have been implemented. There was a period of 17 months between the recommendations being made and the Government’s response. Another two months have passed since the Government’s response, and the next phase of emergency early release is due.
With the previous early release, the prisoners’ victims felt that they were an afterthought, and Victim Support Scotland is on record as saying that just 2 per cent of victims of the criminals who were released in that process were informed. Do you have any confidence that any of the proposed reforms would change that when the second batch of prisoners are released in the new year? Will more than 2 per cent of victims be notified? I am thinking about practical measures that could be implemented now without legislation.