The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1109 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
We do not want to have overlapping reviews, but do you think that there is a risk that we spend too much time doing reviews and not enough time focusing on the action points from those reviews?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do you have any comments on that, Dr Fletcher?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
That is fine—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Graeme Simpson, do you want to comment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Dr Scott, do you have any comments on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Fiona Drouet, in your submission, you mention the university
“failing to recognise so many warning signs, missing opportunities to intervene”.
Would the reviews that are currently available cover that? If not, would the reviews that are included in the bill cover that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
Again, this might just be my understanding of what witnesses have said, but I had thought that, when you go to court, you go to a witness room so that you cannot hear any other evidence that is given. If that is the case, would that not mean that, even if the police were giving evidence virtually, they would still have to be in a separate room so that they could not hear anything that was going on in the court?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
It is on the same line of questioning. The bill basically says that the default position is that the police would still attend in person. Will you outline the everyday strain on officers who are requested to appear at court, and the pressure that that puts on the service? What are the current pressures on police in attending court?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
I am looking at the practicalities of the proposed approach. Virtual court appearances could ease the strain on officers, but are you confident that a virtual system would be practical for officers in their everyday work? I am wondering how officers could be deployed operationally and therefore whether a virtual system would be of any benefit. An officer would not be able to go out on front-line duties if their case might suddenly be called at the court, because they would have to be available to give their evidence virtually. Is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
One of the issues that we hear about with officers having to attend court is that they have to come in on their days off and sometimes have to cancel or fly home from holidays. I take it that the provision for virtual appearances will not help that in any way.