Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 13 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1291 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Scottish Prison Service”

Meeting date: 1 February 2024

Sharon Dowey

One of your key messages is that

“several actions to support improvement in GEOAmey's performance”

included

“issuing improvement notices and applying financial penalties of around £4 million”.

The report goes on to say that

“SPS is now taking more direct action including financial support to support GEOAmey to aid staff recruitment and retention”,

which seems a bit of a contradiction—the SPS is fining GEOAmey and then giving it financial support. To what extent may the application of service credits, totalling more than £4 million, have contributed to GEOAmey's claim that the contract is financially unsustainable?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Scottish Prison Service”

Meeting date: 1 February 2024

Sharon Dowey

I think that there was something in the press last week about staff having to pay back money for their training. Do you know whether that is still happening? Is that part of the contract for GEOAmey?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

So, even if the child did not bring a complaint, the auntie could still be prosecuted for sharing the post.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

So, it could happen.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

On the point that Russell Findlay raised about legislation, you seem to be doing an awful lot of work already, so is the reason for having the bill the fact that it comes with a financial memorandum that will give you resources to be able to implement it?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Finally, with the current and expected future resources, do you think that trauma-informed practices can be implemented meaningfully?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

My colleague Russell Findlay mentioned section 275 applications earlier. Do you support the principle that complainers should have access to independent legal representation when there is an application to use sexual history or character?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Earlier, the Lord Advocate said that one of the single biggest improvements that could be made was to have witnesses better prepared and keep them properly informed. Does the bill go far enough? Should complainers have independent legal representation throughout the process?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Will you tell me more about your concerns about further delay being caused in the system? Is there anything that we could do to modify that?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

I want to go back over something that Pauline McNeill said, to ensure that my understanding of the point is right. Paragraph 38 of your joint submission says:

“As drafted, the Bill would criminalise a family member, friend—or stranger—who shared a child victim’s social media post disclosing they were the victim of a sexual crime. They would not necessarily benefit from the public domain defence already discussed”.

Would that take account of a case in which, for example, someone’s auntie, who should know that they are under 18, has shared their post? Would we be legislating to criminalise the auntie for sharing a post that the complainer had made of their own free will?