The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1416 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I come back to Gillian Reilly. The committee received a written submission from Glasgow ADP, which mentioned that
“Healthcare teams are overwhelmed by an open referral system and caseloads that outweigh community service.”
Can you tell us a wee bit more about the open referral system and how that impacts on healthcare teams?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Thank you for that. I will pass back to the convener now.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I have a small question for Dr Graham about help and support within prisons. The written submission from SHAAP mentions that 6 per cent of respondents in the 2024 prisoner survey who had received support for alcohol consumption when they arrived in prison said that it was helpful but 3 per cent who had received support said that it was not helpful. Do you have any more detail on why they did not think that it was helpful?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Can you comment further on why there are inconsistencies? All the prison estate is now run by the SPS. We have heard a few times that there are issues with prisoners on remand. Do you have any insight into what the inconsistencies are, and are you aware of any work that is being done to address the issue with prisoners on remand?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I am interested in what you said about 24-hour cover. Is there enough cover at weekends and in the evenings?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
The Minister for Victims and Community Safety has recently written to the committee to give the Government’s views on the bill. In her letter, she states that the proposal requires
“further discussion and engagement with justice partners”.
Other comments suggest that the Government might not be supportive of the bill. What is your response to that correspondence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
I will not ask too many questions, but I have one further comment, which is similar to what Liam Kerr said earlier. The minister said:
“there are again opportunities to progress this area through non-legislative measures”.
However, you think that your bill is required. You mentioned the 2021 act, which has not been implemented.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
Amendment 59 would ensure that, when deciding whether there should be a national jurisdiction calling from custody, there must be consideration of the
“individual circumstances of the case”
by the Lord Advocate or procurator fiscal. That could include circumstances such the travelling time and expense incurred by victims, witnesses, the defence and the prosecution. Amendment 59 addresses the various practical issues related to the travel and cost implications of national jurisdiction that were raised by stakeholders such as Victim Support Scotland, the Law Society of Scotland, the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, the Edinburgh Bar Association and Police Scotland.
From my recent discussions on the bill with Victim Support Scotland, I know that it is keen to ensure that there would be no undue burdens on the ability of victims and witnesses to travel. Victim Support Scotland emphasised that victims cannot be expected to travel long distances and take additional time out of their day to attend court. There needs to be a strong consideration of expanding the options for remote evidence, including the acceptable locations from which witnesses can give evidence, which my colleague Liam Kerr’s amendments have tried to deal with. Amendment 59 would simply require that all circumstances in an individual case must be considered before making a national jurisdiction calling from custody. It aims to ensure that there is no unfair burden on any one of the parties who are involved.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
Together, amendments 56 and 57 seek to clarify that, when someone indicates that they wish to receive a paper copy of a document or does not express a willingness to receive it electronically, it will be available on request.
Throughout our evidence sessions on the bill, the committee heard concerns about the ability of certain vulnerable individuals to read and sign electronic copies. In a written submission, Age Scotland told the committee:
“More than a third of older people who have access to the internet lack the basic digital skills to use it effectively and safely.”
Older people in particular may not feel comfortable with, or fully know how to navigate, the system of electronic documents. Even if they receive help or guidance on that, there is still a need to allow for access to physical documents. Victim Support Scotland welcomed the ability for individuals to choose. In their contributions, Age Scotland and Victim Support Scotland emphasised the need for reassurance that physical documents would still be available.
The cabinet secretary has provided reassurance that the bill
“does not remove the scope to communicate in the traditional way”.—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 19 February 2025; c 22.]
However, my amendments seek to clarify that everyone will continue to have access to physical documents on request, so that there is no confusion or misunderstanding.
I move amendment 56.