The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1260 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
You mentioned the increase in case volumes and the increasing complexity of cases. Your budget proposals include only essential funding requirements. Do they include a requirement for increased staff levels due to growth of the case load and the complexity of cases?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
It is fine. Andy Watt, you may already have touched on some of this, but I was looking at the recruitment and retention of local on-call firefighters and further investment. I think that you said that you have just made an investment of £4 million.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Your submission also mentions cost pressures arising from the implementation of body-worn video, and says that that is “an unfunded responsibility”.
Could you tell us more about the cost pressures that you expect to face in that regard? Have you discussed extra funding for that with the Scottish Government?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
The Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Act 2025 includes a range of provisions that might be expected to impact on resources, such as the proposed sexual offences court. What stage of planning are your organisations at in preparing for the implementation of the 2025 act? Are you able to identify when any additional resources might be needed?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Does keeping our communities safe mean that we need to look at taking on more whole-time firefighters rather than retained firefighters?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Right. You have lost 1,239 firefighters and you just said that part of your budget ask is for the recruitment of 210 firefighters and 30 civilian staff. Is that right?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Is it safe to say that, although you are making efficiency savings, those are not actually going to be savings, because you need to focus that money elsewhere in order to continue with the improvements that you are currently making in the system?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
But you need to keep your staffing levels where they are now.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
Will that be enough? Your submission says that you will make a total of £900 million in cost savings, which substantially exceeds the £328 million that was envisaged, but we have lost an awful lot of firefighters. One of the big concerns of people in rural communities is about the increase in response times. That is seen as being caused by a reduction in the number of firefighters, because we do not have as many available to be on call to go to fires when needed. Is investing in 210 staff enough, given that you have lost 1,239?