The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1203 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. In your written submission, you mention that the management of offender at risk due to any substance—MORS—policy needs to be reviewed. Will you set out for the committee what the policy involves and what you think needs to change?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Does it happen across the estate that there are up to 15 people on the policy and there is a check every 15 minutes?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Is the paperwork easy to complete? What are the repercussions for staff if they do not complete the paperwork?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
In the earlier session, the Prison Officers Association said that officers cannot do a search, even with a wand, if the person is of the opposite sex. That must cause issues, especially if we are trying to stop the transfer of drugs around prisons. For example, prisoners in the male estate must know that, if there is a higher percentage of female officers on duty, they will not be searched as the officers do their rounds. What problems does that cause you in the estate? Are you looking to change the policy?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Jim, do you want to comment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
In your submission, you mention—I might not get the pronunciation right—“project CONSUITOR”. Is that how you say it? Will you tell us a wee bit more about that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
You mentioned that staff are not medically trained, but do they receive adequate training, personal protective equipment and risk assessments? You said earlier that they do not know what they are going into when they open a cell in the morning. Do they get adequate training to deal with what they could be faced with each day?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
On that point about searches, you said that staff cannae do a search even if they are using a wand. I can understand the issue if it is a physical search and somebody is put their hands on to somebody else. I am just thinking about how, if you go through airport security or something like that, sometimes someone of the opposite sex does the check and they are not actually touching you. Are you saying that you cannae do that in the prison?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I wondered how much training they get to carry out the policy. The impression that I got from the prison estate when we visited a prison and walked around was that it looked very calm and organised and—dare I say it?—peaceful. I did not see what you are seeing on a daily basis. How do they know what to do, and what training do they get for the MORS policy? If there is that amount of drug taking, at what level do you decide that somebody should go on to the MORS policy, and how much pressure does that put on staff? What would be the implications if there were a death in prison due to a drug overdose? Would the responsibility fall on the staff for not putting somebody on the MORS policy when maybe they should have been on it and being observed every 15 minutes?