The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1291 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
You covered some of this in your responses to Rona Mackay, but do you have any comments on the financial and resource aspects of the bill that you have not already raised?
On 25 June, we heard from Pam Gosal MSP that the “maximum cost” of the bill would be £23 million but that the investment would be worth making because it would achieve an estimated £7 billion in savings by reducing domestic abuse offending costs. Is £23 million a realistic figure? Should other things be considered in the financial memorandum? Do you have any other comments?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
I am sure that a lot of organisations would make good use of it. However, comments were made about whether a specialist person coming in and delivering education rather than a schoolteacher would be preferable. Are such costs addressed? Do we need to put more funding in, given the potential savings? We heard that the bill’s provisions would cost £23 million but that £7 billion would be saved by reducing domestic abuse reoffending.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
I have one final question. Earlier, you said that colleagues in the public sector had concerns about the amount of bureaucracy involved. Could that be addressed by extra funding? Could you tell us concisely what the public sector concerns were and who they came from?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
That is fine.
I have a question about older firefighters and the fitness test. Is that a concern? I have heard reports that the fitness level for younger firefighters is the same as that for older ones and that, if the level was changed slightly, we might keep more people operational.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. Among the changes that we are seeing, there is an increased reliance on duty firefighters. In your submission you have highlighted the
“sustained recruitment and retention issues”
that the duty system is facing. Will you set out your specific concerns about staff and public safety, should the proposed options be adopted?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
I have a wee question about colour blindness. The SFRS is the only UK service that removes firefighters as a result of colour vision testing. There is no evidence of risk and there is a poor test quality and no fallback plan. Are you finding that people are being taken off the run or whatever because of the new requirement for colour vision?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
My final question was covered by Katy Clark earlier, but I have a big interest in the issue. In the FBU’s opinion, will any increase in response times for any appliance in some areas ever be acceptable? I read through your “MSP Briefing Note Autumn 2025”, in which you said that, in a contribution,
“the Minister made a number of statements which, at best, were misinformed, and at worst consciously untrue.”
In the briefing note, you made a couple of comments about response times. Do you have any other comments?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
There was a press release that said that there was an increase in the number of domestic fires. I know that we hear a lot of comments that the number of fires is reducing, but that press release was put out by the Minister for Victims and Community Safety.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
I will follow on from Liam Kerr’s line of questioning. Police Scotland has a clear budget ask for 2026-27. We are hearing reports of increasing wait times for 101 calls, a lack of response to 999 calls, a lack of road traffic officers, and of officers spending a full shift taking those in custody to various police stations due to some stations or custody suites being closed.
Do you believe that the figures that Police Scotland has asked for will be sufficient to meet the increasing pressure and complexity of work that the police are dealing with?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Sharon Dowey
I want to go back to some of the previous questions that you have been asked. Regardless of the legislation in various countries, there is still a sex trade, and we have heard from sex workers who are concerned that criminalising the buyer will lead to more violence against them. They will not be able to do safety checks or identity verifications, and more of the work will take place at the buyer’s location of choice. You have said that you had discussions with some of those groups. What concerns were raised by those sex workers? You said earlier that there is no evidence that they have genuine concerns. What are your thoughts about their genuine concerns about the unintended consequences of the bill?