The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 528 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Carol Mochan
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Carol Mochan
Welcome to the committee, Andrew. Advice Direct Scotland currently operates across a range of subject areas. I am interested to know what experience Advice Direct Scotland has in providing advocacy services. If you have to adapt your ways of working to deliver this service, how might you do that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Carol Mochan
That is helpful. At £3.2 million, the contract value is lower than the previous one. Have you got a plan in place to ensure that the lower value will not mean that the service will go down? Will you be able to continue to support the same number of people with the same high-quality service?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Carol Mochan
I thank the committee for allowing me to say a few words.
I fully support the petition, convener, and I want to reiterate what you and Tess White have said about the police decision. It is very welcome.
However, I believe that the committee could look at some relatively simple and straightforward issues in order to complete all this work, and I therefore urge it to write to the Crown Office, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and the Scottish Prison Service to seek similar assurances to those from Police Scotland that we have heard about today. That would complete what we are trying to do in accurately collecting this data, which is essential to maintaining public trust, to monitoring and to research and public policy in this area.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Carol Mochan
All my questions have been answered.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Carol Mochan
I think that the witnesses have already answered some of my questions, which are around training and competency. Just to be clear, there are voluntary standards, which we have been told will support regulation and improve safety, and I wonder whether you think that they will do that. Alternatively, do you think that we need to have mandatory training qualifications?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Carol Mochan
That is helpful—thank you.
I have one more question, which is about the focus on physical disability and whether mental and behavioural disorders are picked up in the way that they should be. Do you have any feedback on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Carol Mochan
I will explore some of the points that you made about inconsistency. The report describes stakeholder views that ADP decisions can appear inconsistent. A couple of constituents have raised issues with timescales for redeterminations, appeals at the First-tier Tribunal and challenges around that. People I have been speaking to have wondered about inconsistent decision making. Did you get much of that in producing the report?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Audit Scotland has recommended defining acceptable levels of client satisfaction. Can that be done in a way that provides meaningful opportunities for improvement and which avoids arbitrary target setting?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Good morning. A key argument for the inclusion in the bill of a definition of the term “sustainable development” is that there is no statutory definition of it, but, as we have heard, there are multiple references to the term in law. How would a new definition simplify the landscape?