The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 593 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Carol Mochan
This adds to what Emma Harper and Kim Atkinson have been saying. I would be interested in hearing about the piece of research that has been done. I recently visited a group of women in quite a rural area—the boost group in Girvan—and they were talking about the kinds of things that they would like to do. It is sometimes difficult to find the space, as has been said, but people are often very good at coming up with their own solutions. Referring to the research that you have talked about, what can we do to gather information about how people can get solutions for different kinds of sports and activities that would suit their health needs? Is there something more that we need to do at a Scotland-wide level to capture that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Carol Mochan
:Amendment 109 would require the Government to carry out a review of the bill’s impact on the NHS workforce. It arose from concerns about the impact that the bill could have on the NHS if workers are trained in a specific area and then pulled into the private sector. It is really a probing amendment to put on record Scottish Labour’s concern about the impact that the bill could have on the NHS workforce, given the amount of pressure that it is already under.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Carol Mochan
:We have discussed that. The Government needs to ensure that we get the right person in the right place at the right time in whatever profession they choose, and back that up with the knowledge that we have the right staffing for public services.
I thank members for their interventions, which are much appreciated.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Carol Mochan
:Yes—it is something that we in Scottish Labour have been thinking about, and I lodged amendment 109 to probe whether the Government takes that issue seriously. We know that there are already pressures on the NHS workforce, so I would like to hear from the minister what the Government can or will do to ensure that, if the bill is passed, it does not disrupt our NHS workforce.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Carol Mochan
Like others, Scottish Labour supports the Government in exploring how best to approach the regulation and licensing of non-surgical cosmetic procedures. In considering the bill, we have sought to balance the need for fair and appropriate regulation that prioritises public safety with not putting unnecessary requirements on the service, while ensuring that we get the right support for current practitioners.
The purpose behind my amendment 110 is to ensure that proper checks and balances are put in place. It would require the Scottish Government, within 12 months and then within two years of royal assent, to assess the support that has been provided to the industry. The amendment arose from concerns about ensuring that many skilled practitioners are not left behind. It would require the Government to assess the support that has been provided to independent and non-medical providers. That support includes training opportunities to upskill and the provision of guidance and qualification pathways. The amendment would also require the Government to report on whether any financial support has been offered to remote and rural businesses.
The Government has provided an assurance that proper support and guidance has been put in place, which is something that Labour supports, but my amendment would require the Government to report on that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Carol Mochan
My initial thought is that I can imagine that, sometimes, a review request might be time sensitive in order to support family members and to get that appropriate access. Will the system allow for that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Carol Mochan
You say that the guidance will contain some information about how the Care Inspectorate will be involved if a review is in place. How will that process work?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Carol Mochan
Good morning. I have some questions around the review process. Regulation 6 requires a care home provider, on receipt of a valid request, to review a decision. Concerns have been raised with us about that. One is about whether there could be proactive rather than reactive reviews. Another concerns the fact that there is no judicial appeal route. Has there been any consideration of that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Carol Mochan
That is appreciated.
A concern has been raised about the requirement for review requests to be submitted in writing. I just want to be sure about accessibility, because some people may have family members who cannot go down that route.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Carol Mochan
That is helpful. I appreciate that we need a record, but, particularly in those circumstances, there may be people who need a certain level of support to put something in writing.