The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 893 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Is there still the possibility that you could pull the plug on the two vessels?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Good morning, everyone. I want to go back to a question that I would have asked Roy Brannen had he been here. When you were last before us, I asked Mr Brannen whether CMAL had been overruled or whether there was a threat to overrule it, and he said explicitly that that was not the case. However, in a submission from the senior management team at FMEL, they suggest that some degree of overruling took place.
I will quote from that submission at some length, just for context. It states:
“Our chairman met with the cabinet secretary for finance Derek Mackay on the 5th of June 2018 to insist that the Scottish Government intervene to instruct CMAL to take part in an Expert Determination Process”.
The chairman was told explicitly that the Government would not do so. The submission continues:
“Derek Mackay told him that he could not do this because ministers had received a legal letter from the CMAL Board, threatening to resign en masse, if the government interfered with them, as an independent board. Derek Mackay said that this would be politically very damaging for the government, and he could not intervene.”
Mr McColl says that the reason that the Government was not prepared to intervene at that stage was that
“The government had forced CMAL to place the order with Ferguson against their will. We were not aware at the time of the strength of opposition from CMAL to placing the order with Ferguson. Had we known this at the time it would have caused us to seriously question accepting the order.”
Why does Mr McColl believe that CMAL was overruled? Is he misrepresenting, misrecollecting or providing a misleading account of the situation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
You can be certain about that, but you are not certain about what those discussions were, because you were not there.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
He took the final decision.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
Okay. No minister signed the contract. CMAL had significant concerns, and it raised them with ministers, then it signed the contract. Was CMAL overruled, or were its views ignored?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
The Auditor General does not think that that paper trail is sufficient.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
Completely certain.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
Did she discuss ferries?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
That would be Derek Mackay.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Craig Hoy
I am looking at exhibit 1 in the Auditor General’s report. In September 2015:
“CMAL advises Transport Scotland of the significant risks of awarding the contract to FMEL, and states its preference is to start the procurement process again”.
In October:
“Transport Scotland advises CMAL that Scottish ministers are aware of the risks and are content for CMAL to award the contract to FMEL”.
It is quite clear that either CMAL’s wishes were ignored or they were overruled.