Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1202 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:How easy would it be to pivot away from the commitments on community-based healthcare and primary care in order to move that resource back? The Government would potentially have to examine portfolios such as local government and justice if it found that there was inflexibility between those two areas of healthcare in Scotland.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:Last week, we found out about the Scottish Government’s flagship invest-to-save scheme—when I say “flagship”, I do so in an understated way. In the present financial year, the scheme has managed to spend only £12 million of the £30 million that was allocated to it.

I would like to get an impression of whether such schemes are the right mechanism or catalyst for delivering efficiency. Did your organisations engage with the invest-to-save scheme? I get the impression that, if that is indicative of the level of appetite for efficiency within Government, it is relatively muted. Have your organisations engaged with that Scottish Government scheme?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:Some decisions taken by central Government obviously have an impact on local government through the wage bill. The Scottish Government has set a 9 per cent pay policy, which appears to have almost all been spent now, in the first couple of years of the policy. What is COSLA therefore expecting in relation to wage growth within the local government sector, next year and in future years?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:If there is no further money coming forward and the unions do not agree to a real-terms cut in wages, what is the net result for other services?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:Okay—

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Craig Hoy

:Contained in the spending review for the next three years is a significant shift in the focus of health expenditure away from hospitals and towards community-based healthcare. The overall budget rises by 2.4 per cent in real terms, whereas the increase for national and territorial health boards is 0.4 per cent. That means that other areas such as community-based healthcare and primary care see much more significant increases of roughly 12 per cent. The Institute for Fiscal Studies says that, for health boards to be able to continue to deliver, they will have to make 3 per cent annualised efficiency savings. The IFS describes that as potentially “heroic” when compared with the recent capacity to deliver efficiency savings.

Some health boards—for example, NHS Dumfries and Galloway—are at stage 3 of the support and intervention framework as a result of their financial pressures. If health boards do not deliver those 3 per cent efficiency savings, what will be the risk to the sustainability of Scotland’s hospitals and those health boards? Would the Scottish Government have to step in? Would that move resource away from primary care, community care or elsewhere? Is there a risk that some of our health boards could, in effect, go to the wall between now and the end of the decade?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Legacy Issues (Public Administration)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Craig Hoy

Good morning. In your submission, you seem to place a lot of strategic importance on the national performance framework, which is subject to review at this point. We expect the new framework and outcomes to emerge early in the next session of Parliament. If that is going to be the centrepiece of how we hold the public administration to account in Scotland, or one of the central pillars of that, what does that framework need to look like?

The criticism that has been made on a cross-party basis, including from ministers, is that the framework has not been fit for purpose and has been far too woolly. If it is going to be a fundamental pillar of the way in which we hold the public administration to account, what does it need to look like and what should be the outcomes? By common consent, they are too nebulous at the moment.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 5) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Craig Hoy

I will come in at the end.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Craig Hoy

The paper that I am looking at says,

“While application volumes have remained relatively stable, the authorisation rate has been lower than forecast”.

Has there been any change to the authorisation methodology that might mean that more people are being refused the benefit, or taken off it at annual review?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Craig Hoy

When we talked about the number of applications to the fund, one would assume that you may have been keen to get shovel-ready projects to show that the scheme was working. You have to admit that it is quite concerning that nearly half of that budget has not been spent, given the need—because of the budget imperative—for you to reform at pace and at scale.