The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 781 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
I have one final question, which is more relevant today than it would otherwise have been. You said to the Public Audit Committee that the difference paid from the block grant in relation to welfare spending, which, if the UK Government goes in a slightly different direction in relation to how people qualify for welfare, will be £1.5 billion or thereabouts, is “material but ... manageable.” Personally, I think that it is material but possibly unmanageable at present. Is there not a significant risk in the Scottish Government’s budget, because of where we are at present and where we might end up if the UK Government cuts back on welfare spending?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
The act that we are looking at dates from 2010, so this is the third extension to it. I accept that we need to do something, as having some process is better than having no process, so can you give us some assurance to convince us that this is not just a holy grail and that we are not going to keep renewing it while seeing no material change?
In 2011, the Christie report said:
“It is estimated that as much as 40 per cent of all spending on public services is accounted for by interventions that could have been avoided by prioritising a preventative approach.”
You are now talking again about the need for a preventative approach when the Christie report, which was commissioned by John Swinney, came to that estimate of 40 per cent back in 2011. Roll forward 14 years, do you have any basis on which to assess what that percentage is now? Have you made any positive impact in relation to that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
The financial memorandum anticipates significant savings in the long term. If we think about social harms, family breakdown and loss of employment—we can go through the range—£4 being saved for every £1 that is spent certainly looks to be a pretty decent equation, but that will come in the long term. Have you an assessment of the long-term horizon? Is it three to five years or five to 10 years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
You said in your opening remarks that the bill would have a significant impact on those who live in Scotland’s most deprived communities, who are more likely to die from drugs and alcohol misuse. A lot of Government funding is focused on ending child deprivation and we know that those things are all inextricably linked. Is it fair to say that the expenditure will yield the greatest improvement in quality of life for the people who live in deprived communities who, in many respects, still fall through the cracks?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Finally, the Auditor General said in the same report that the Government
“has not provided enough leadership to help public sector bodies deliver change.”
You had the summit recently, and you are leading the charge, so is your neck on the line in relation to delivering that holy grail?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Given that we are again talking about preventative spending, it would probably be good to see on what basis it was assessed and whether any progress has been made.
Jumping forward to last autumn, Audit Scotland took up a similar position, in which it said that there is still
“no evidence of large-scale change on the ground”
and that the Government
“does not know what additional funding is required to support reform”.
You have put £30 million in the budget this year for invest to save. Can you give the Auditor General some assurance that you are working towards getting an actual figure that you will work towards to leverage in the reforms that ultimately might meet the initial objectives of the act?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Finally, finally—sorry, convener—you identified the concept of the single authority model in relation to health boards and councils. Is that a lesson that you should roll out through Government more widely, given that you say that it is quite difficult for you as the minister in charge to drive reform? Do you need to consider coherence in relation to the number of public bodies that are out there?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Ross. A fair few of the questions that I might have dwelt on have already been asked, but perhaps I can help out Mr Mason a little bit with regard to costs.
On the alcohol side of the equation, the alcohol and drinks industry is already committed to significant expenditure on combating alcohol harm and community alcohol partnerships, and there is also money that it puts into self-regulation and so on. Have you had any discussions with that industry about how money that is already being spent could be repurposed for such a programme, or how, say, some of the revenues from minimum unit pricing—which, according to the Fraser of Allander Institute, are approximately £32 million a year—could be used to meet some of the costs of what I think is a worthwhile bill?