The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1018 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Should you not have the number at your fingertips?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
It is still a significant sum.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning. Fionna Kell, you talked about a sunrise clause—quite a novel concept—that could become part of the fabric of building in Scotland.
When Peter Drummond, from the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland, appeared before the committee, he said that every 10 or 15 years, another building scandal seems to come along. Given the timeframe for remediation, and given that this has been going on for a number of years, how likely do you think it is that another building scandal will come along for which the tax would potentially have to be used to start remediation? Does that not give rise to concern that this is going to become a tax on house builders or house purchasers in Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
One of the elements in balancing the budget would involve sticking to your pay policy, but there is significant reference to pay deals littered through the figures. Local government was given another £29.7 million for pay deals, the police were given £6.2 million for pay awards and £85.4 million was provided to address pay pressures in the health service. What are those pay pressures in the health service, for example? Why could you not have accounted for them as part of your 9 per cent pay strategy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
I have one final question. One general criticism of legislation in this Parliament and at Westminster is that the Government is increasingly using skeleton legislation. That is what I call fill-in-the-blanks-later legislation, and that is sometimes the controversial blanks. With the bill as it stands—or rather, once it has been fleshed out with law making through delegated powers—is there any capacity for legal challenge to it on the basis of fairness or equity?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Fine. There is also the issue of £30.2 million for the Scottish Qualifications Authority to support on-going activities. Can you say what those on-going activities are and why they are one of the budgeted costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Why was that not in the original forecasts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
It is a big chunk of change, though. You do not suddenly find £30.2 million.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
It probably should have been in there at the beginning of the year.
In relation to an underspend—this is welcome in some respects, albeit you have net zero targets—significant savings seem to have been identified in demand-led schemes such as remediation to windows in housing. Why is that not being spent?