The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 982 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning, cabinet secretary. In response to Mr Greer, you talked about how you would like to ensure that local government is empowered. I do not say this very often, but I have full sympathy with you in respect of the timing of the UK budget and the knock-on effect that that will have on the Scottish budget. That will also have a knock-on effect for Scottish councils; they are very concerned that they are in effect the last link in the chain, which could cause them real issues.
However, there are certain things that you could do now to make their job easier. In respect of your remarks to Mr Greer, do you rule out a council tax freeze next year in order to allow councils to start their modelling earlier?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Looking forward, which is, obviously, the purpose of this evidence session, how concerned are you, on a scale of one to 10, about the underlying issues that we now face in the budget, in terms of both your projected spend and your projected revenues?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
You would concede, however, that enhancing the benefit system is one thing, but having more people on an equivalent benefit is a much deeper problem. When they were in front of us, Professor Ulph and Professor Breedon accepted that there was an issue around transfers; they said that they had relative confidence that an underlying trend exists in the Scottish system that is of concern. That will emerge quite clearly between now and the end of the decade.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
What message does it send if the Scottish Government says that it will in effect just let £36 million of taxpayers’ money go?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Perhaps the media coverage spoke to another narrative.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I have one final short question—sorry, two questions. You said that the work on reducing the overall size of the Scottish Government and on the invest to save scheme is fundamentally important. Will you confirm how many applications were made to the invest to save scheme?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I will reverse a bit because of that politician’s answer. Do you therefore anticipate that councils will be able to set their council tax rates next year? That would be one of the levers that they have at their disposal. If they are doing pre-planning, they will want to anticipate what their multiyear increases will be.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
However, you concede, as the SFC does, that the gaps between the Scottish Government’s spending projections and the available funding are significant. Do you accept that at this point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
The SFC’s projection of a £4.7 billion gap identifies that it is £2.6 billion in resource spending and £2.1 billion in capital spending. How concerned should we be that the capital spend gap is proportionately more, given that capital expenditure is, in one sense, funding the engines of growth—the physical infrastructure? Is that a long-term concern?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
In relation to the interplay between UK benefits and Scotland-specific benefits, would you accept, for example, having the Scottish child payment be dependent on universal credit? When you and I have talked in the past, you have said that you do not like to put cliff edges in, but would you accept that the interplay between those benefit systems puts in place a barrier to work? People will lose one benefit if they do more hours and therefore have greater earned income. The structure of the benefit system in Scotland is such that having some of it devolved may work against getting people into employment.