The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1053 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
I go back to the role of the legal sector in relation to cost control, mission creep and so on. In his submission to us, Roger Mullin says:
“The unintended consequence of this is that individuals and legal firms, paid on the basis of their time involved in an inquiry, have no incentive to be as efficient as possible and indeed will get rewarded from the public purse by maximising their time involved.”
Based on your experience, Lord Hardie, is there a risk that, given that the whole mechanism has been built up and people are paid on a daily basis, there is some incentive for things to slide?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning. The document makes reference to the savings that carers currently provide to Scotland. The estimate that the Scottish Government has come up with is £13.9 billion per year, which totals £14.3 billion when healthcare costs are taken into account. Where does that figure come from and what confidence do you have that that is the net saving at the moment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
As per the earlier remarks. To go back to Mr Marra’s point, given that the scope of the bill has been reduced and the national care service initiative has been set to one side, why are we still looking at a run rate of more than £1 million a month?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
With due respect, minister, the work on understanding was done by the Feeley review, with the Government then introducing a bill, so the money has not been spent on developing greater understanding. It has been spent on the pathway towards the creation of a national care service that you are no longer pursuing, so you could argue that a large chunk of that £30 million is taxpayers’ money down the drain.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
It almost sounds as though you are making the case that a national care service is not required, if all those things could have been done by simply reprofiling existing workstreams. Surely the huge monolithic national care service is not actually necessary, minister.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
For clarity, will the existing body be removed completely? No sponsoring element in the Scottish Government will remain, so there will be no duplication.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
This question has partly been answered, so I will not dwell too long on it. Ms Dunlop, you identified public inquiries as becoming “the gold standard”, but there is an issue now. Even in relation to the tragic events in Liverpool last night, we can see that levels of public distrust, scepticism and anger are at a relative high, historically. The British social attitudes survey last year showed that the level of trust in Government and institutions is at a historic low.
Is there a case for going back and looking at the Inquiries Act 2005 or the guidance on when the act can be used to trigger a public inquiry in order to find a way that can perhaps better serve the public, rather than the public asking in this atmosphere of distrust for a public inquiry because that is the gold standard? As you rightly identified, we could look at John Sturrock’s review of NHS Highland or Lord Bonomy’s report on infant cremation, for example. Do we need to level with the public and say that there are better ways of doing this, or is it time to go back to the original legislation and the guidance to set a new threshold for the triggering of a public inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
The other element in relation to value for taxpayers’ money is what is done with an inquiry report. In your submission to us, you argued that, effectively, the reports can
“sit on ministers’ shelves gathering dust”.
What could be done in the future, either by the Parliament or by an external body, to ensure that the lessons that should be learned are acted upon?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Craig Hoy
Dr Ireton, are there international examples of Governments putting in place a better mechanism to ensure that lessons are learned and then implemented?