The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 367 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
We have a similar set of questions for this panel as we had for the previous panel. Sections 16 and 17 relate to trustees’ powers of investment. Some of the witnesses will have heard me asking a question about that. Both the Law Society and the academic Yvonne Evans, who we heard from last week, have suggested that, in view of Scotland’s increasing emphasis on net zero, sections 16 and 17 could be amended to allow trusts to adopt environmentally friendly investment policies, particularly when those investments might underperform other investments.
As I asked the previous panel, it would be helpful for the committee to hear your views on that idea. Do you support it in principle and do you think that sections 16 and 17 could be amended or tweaked in order to make it clearer to trustees that they have the power to make those sorts of investments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I am happy to leave it there, convener. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
There have been different views, which makes me question whether there should be clarification or an explicit line in the bill to say that that approach is perfectly permissible and within the powers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Would it be possible to allow a case-by-case approach to be taken but to still be clear in the bill that that is an option for those trustees who are interested?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
No, thank you, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Thank you very much. I will hand back to the convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Does the bill as drafted allow trustees to make such investments, or does it need to be amended to make it clear that such an option is open to them?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
My question is on section 72, which is about the right of a spouse or civil partner to inherit. It features in part 2, which is on succession law, and various stakeholders, including the Law Society, have said that a distinction should be drawn between spouses or civil partners who were living with the deceased person at the time of their death and spouses or civil partners who had previously separated from the deceased person but who had not divorced or had not had the partnership dissolved.
It would be helpful for the committee to hear the witnesses’ views on that policy idea and that distinction. For example, do you agree that, with good drafting of the provision, it is possible to describe and define what is and is not separation? Obviously, we are aware of circumstances in which people are still very much together and in a relationship, even though they might be living separately for reasons outwith their control. One of them might be in prison, say, or working overseas. Is it possible to draft a clear distinction to cover those circumstances and would it be helpful to do so?
10:00Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
As the convener said to the previous panel, if any witness has any suggestions, thoughts or ideas that they would like the committee to follow up, we would be very grateful to receive them.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I want to put you all on the spot and ask how that would work in practice. Would it require a formal separation agreement? The sound cut out slightly when Ross Anderson was speaking, but I thought that I heard him say that it would be helpful but impossible. I am interested in understanding how we might be able to make such a distinction work.