The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 747 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
Okay. I am looking at the three protected characteristics that I mentioned—religion or belief, sex and gender reassignment. My understanding is that there is some concern at the police training college about the conflict of rights. Are you aware of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
You have not mentioned Police SEEN—the Police Sex Equality and Equity Network. Have you taken input from that group?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
If an employee or a group of employees has a concern about, let us say, the police training centre at Tulliallan, how would they raise that with you, the chief inspector or HR?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
I realise that it is a lot of work to look at all nine characteristics. You say that you are covering most of them, but looking at prioritising and focus areas, roughly 60 per cent of your workforce are women and 40 per cent are men, so are you doing impact assessments of the policies that you introduce in relation to, let us say, men and women and the other protected characteristics?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
If you have staff who are across each of the nine characteristics, which ones have you focused on first? Have you taken a Pareto approach in which you look at a critical few, or have you looked at all of them equally, and is there balance across all nine?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Tess White
To summarise, you have done equality impact assessments and risk assessments against the nine protected characteristics and you have looked at the risks that are associated with those in relation to the workplace setting. In response to my question about Police SEEN, you said that it has made a submission but you have not fully reviewed it or given that group feedback.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Tess White
I have a couple of questions to follow up on rural proofing the budget and spending cuts. I will then go on to my next topic, which is about where spending is being earmarked.
On funding cuts, the SHRC published a report that identified a
“failure to meet the most basic international obligations related to the right to food, the right to housing”—
we have talked about housing quite a lot today—
“the right to health, and the right to cultural life”
in the Highlands and Islands. The report has massive implications for rural Scotland more widely.
You may remember that, when you met the committee in November, I asked you about rural proofing and you said:
“As equalities minister, I cannot be expected to deal with such in-depth detail on each portfolio.”—[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 5 November 2024; c 16.]
How can you address such obvious failings in equalities budgeting when you are not across the detail? What are you going to do differently, in addition to talking to ministers, to address geographical inequalities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Tess White
That is perfect, minister, thank you.
It is very encouraging that you have said you are going to meet the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care and that that meeting is coming up.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Tess White
I turn to my last, follow-up, question. We have talked about funding in the equalities portfolio. This point is about accountability and transparency. I have been told that one of your former SNP colleagues, Alison Thewliss, who appeared with you in a photo with banners saying “Decapitate TERFs” and who refused to say whether she accepts the Cass report, has been hired by Rape Crisis Scotland. If that is indeed the case, is that one hand washing the other? Do you recognise the concerns that Rape Crisis Scotland, as a Government-funded body—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Tess White
That is my question—but if the minister does not want to answer it, I can address it separately. Thank you.