The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 759 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Tess White
The Finance and Public Administration Committee had serious concerns about the financial memorandum that accompanies the bill. What is your view of that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Tess White
What you said on co-design—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Tess White
One of the questions that remains unanswered comes from Reform Scotland, which feels that there has been inadequate
“explanation about why simply removing local government from social care will lead to an improvement in delivery.”
It also pointed out that
“The loss of local understanding and accountability, especially in more rural areas, were highlighted as risks of the proposals during the consultation”.
Will you comment on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Tess White
I have one question for Alison White. I noticed that you said that co-design should come before the legislation, not after it. My question relates to what you said about your concern that further integration could make adult social care a delayed-discharges service. Could you go into more detail as to how that might happen?
10:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
Huge parts of the bill will be implemented through secondary legislation, which will mean much less parliamentary scrutiny. Can you comment on the appropriateness of that use of secondary legislation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
I do; I have a question for Eddie Fraser. SOLACE has said:
“there is very little detail or consideration of the significant implications for local authorities, not only in respect of workforce, but also in respect of council assets and liabilities”.
Do you agree with that assessment? Do you want to put on the record the effect that the bill will have on local government workforce, assets and liabilities?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
I have two questions, one for Jennifer Paton and the other for Isla Davie.
The picture that I have in my head is of being asked to comment on or scrutinise an aeroplane that is being built as it is flying through the air, which is obviously very difficult. In its written submission, the Law Society of Scotland has been very critical of the lack of detail in the draft legislation and the fact that it makes it really hard to scrutinise the bill. Therefore, I wonder, Jennifer, if you can expand on the view in the Law Society’s submission that
“It is not clear what safeguards are in place to ensure that co-design is meaningful, effective and timely and that Scottish Ministers are appropriately held to account by Parliament for the design and implementation of the National Care Service.”
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
There are benefits to centralisation, but there are also benefits to keeping things local. The Faculty of Advocates was represented on the previous panel of witnesses, and its written submission says:
“There is clearly a risk that the quality of services previously provided effectively on a local model is diluted when provision is attempted on a larger, national, scale.”
Is the nub of your concern that the move to centralisation means that control, power and funding will go to the centre, at the expense of quality local services?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
If you do not have a product, how can you scrutinise it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Tess White
That is great. I note your comment that you are waiting with bated breath to see what is coming.