The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 759 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
In your submission, you talk about a potential fracturing of national oversight of some aspects of the NHS. Will you say a bit more about that, given the tension that you mentioned between the national care service board and the NHS boards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
I am thinking about the types of roles that should be represented.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
Do not worry. We will move on.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
Rather than staying with the idea of purpose, I will ask my follow-up question about shared accountability. To what extent would shared accountability help to deliver the board’s purpose and objectives? Some people think that shared accountability could be a fudge or that it can be difficult to get traction.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
With something so important as a new national care service, there should be clarity if it is going to cut through and deliver. In your original submission, you said:
“it could be several years before areas which are ... worst served by social care services could hope to see any improvement”
and
“there are no interim measures proposed for areas or services which are recognised as being currently badly served.”
I suppose that the point is that, even if those concerns are addressed, the worst-served areas will not feel any impact for several years. If we are talking about shared accountability at the top, I will just go back to the discussion that we had with the previous panel, during which the word “fragmented” was used. If there is fragmented leadership, added to the concern that has been expressed by your organisation, which is that it will be years before the bill will have any impact, that suggests that the process is going to be fraught with issues.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
I accept that your area of expertise is not social care, but I have a question on an area that does lie within your expertise. Do you have a legislative point of view on how, in the bill, the Scottish Government has approached the detail about the board?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
That is helpful—thank you.
My final question is for Jennifer Paton. We have heard that there is no detailed form, and the witnesses in the previous session talked about fragmentation. Do you have any views on that in respect of the legislative process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Tess White
Yes. What is your view on how the Scottish Government is approaching the detail of the board’s creation in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Tess White
That is helpful. Would Frank Reilly like to comment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Tess White
Some people think that the proposals will create a tug of war. I see that Stephen Morgan is nodding, as is Frank Reilly—I will go to you.