The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1459 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I want to shift the focus a little bit. In the public sector equality duty, three needs are outlined, and the third of them is about fostering good relations. That need is often overlooked; public bodies do not necessarily focus attention on it or fully understand what it means. I am interested in your thoughts on that.
Pauline, I will start with you. Where do you see the fostering of good relations in your work with public bodies on the public sector equality duty? Do they get it? Do they talk about it? Does it feature at all?
12:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
The example that you used is one that involves thinking about equality stuff at the end of a budgetary decision process, rather than thinking about the equalities impacts of budgetary decisions as they are being made.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. Marie McNair wants to ask a little bit more about the reforms, so I will leave her to pick that up, because we need to explore it. I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Would you like guidance to be addressed in the discussions that are happening about the PSED reform?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I am going to shift focus a bit. A lot of our conversation has been around discrimination and the needs to eliminate discrimination and to advance equalities. Jatin Haria, right at the start, you talked about the potential conflict between the three needs in the Equality Act 2010 and the operational duties. The third need—fostering good relations—often gets overlooked. It is something that we are missing, both in the broader conversation about the public sector equality duty and in the proposed reforms. Do you think that public bodies understand what it means to foster good relations? How can we ensure that that need is taken as seriously as it should be?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
The frustration that you and Rohini Sharma Joshi feel comes out quite strongly in what you said.
Vic Valentine, given that the PSED is not delivering, what are the barriers and the failures?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I ask the same question of Clare Gallagher.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Thanks. Lindsey Millen, I ask you the same question on fostering good relations.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much, Clare.
Jatin, you said that
“the point of having the public sector equality duty was to change people’s lives, but that has been missing”.
That is a very stark statement that we, in this committee, should take seriously. Is your view similar to Clare’s—that the reason for that is the gap between process and outcome—or is something else going on, as well?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Rohini. Vic, will you comment on fostering good relations? Where do you see the barriers and the opportunities? Is any work happening in that area?