The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
We are looking at the Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 and thinking about what we want to see, given that the world is a very different place now to what it was in 2014. How could we use procurement to tackle things like the gendered nature of different employment sectors or the inaccessibility of different sectors to disabled people, whether as workers or as suppliers? Are there things that we could, and should, look at to make the legislation deliver what we want for Scotland as a whole? Joanne Davidson might want to kick off on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
Are we missing a trick, especially given the urgency with which we all need to tackle certain issues that are no single authority’s or agency’s responsibility? I am thinking of issues such as reducing inequality and dealing with the climate emergency. Are there issues that we are missing not only because we are asking for the wrong information or too much of certain types of information, but because we are not allowing for weighting flexibility? We have spoken about the 75 per cent threshold. Would you say that that is what needs to change if the environmental, climate emergency or reducing inequality targets are to be much more meaningful?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
Colin, I know that you have to leave, so I come to you next.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have another question about that, which will take us off on another tangent.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
Okay. I will follow up on that theme. I have a question about the broader social benefits that we are supposed to get from procurement changes and improvements, with a focus on reducing inequality. Do we—the Government or whoever—collect data on what contractors and subcontractors are doing and what their supply chains are? Do we know about the environmental and social impacts or whether there is a focus on reducing inequality? Are we collecting the right data? If not, whose responsibility is it to do so? Who can bring all of that together, given what has been said about the burden of bureaucracy and all the administration?
11:00Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
When you say more engagement, with whom? What should the committee recommend?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
I will come back to you, Colin, as the question has moved on. Are there any other things that you wish to say in response?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
My final question—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Maggie Chapman
Do you not see that there is a potential impact on some of the broader policy work that we are trying to achieve in Scotland if ISDS clauses remain in place and foreign investors can then sue the Scottish Government over certain policy proposals that it enacts?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for that offer of on-going engagement on the impacts of the decisions.
As you said at the start of the meeting, the desire is to have equality, opportunity and community at the heart of all Government decisions. Those missions and challenges cut across portfolios. How have the conversations and the budget discussions that you have had with the Deputy First Minister and others gone? Are you able to talk about the impact of the employability cuts on, for instance, black and minority ethnic people? Perhaps I am putting on my equalities committee hat, but, if we are thinking about equalities across the board—equality of opportunity and fundamental equality, as the missions state—how are we tracking the impact of decisions now, never mind further down the line? What assessment have you made of the impacts of previous decisions and how has that informed current decisions?