The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for joining us this and for your contributions so far.
I want to extend the conversation to look at how we can better use procurement to deliver the social and other policy outcomes that we might wish to deliver. Fair work and gender pay have already been mentioned. Melanie Mackenzie, in response to the convener’s first question, talked about the considerations that you would give to environmental and fair work issues, for example. Will you say a bit more about that and how you balance the regulatory and legislative requirements of procurement with those policy objectives?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
Do you pull demographic and socioeconomic data into that decision-making process at the local level?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. That is helpful.
Lynette Robertson mentioned gender inequality issues. Is procurement a vehicle for tackling social inequalities? What are the barriers to doing that? What do we need to do better?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
The monitoring system that you have talked about comes with a not-insignificant overhead. Are there economies of scale that we might consider, if not across the whole of Scotland then at least regionally, in understanding what kinds of monitoring, data collection and evaluation are required, or does monitoring have to carried out on an authority-by-authority basis, given local variation and specificities?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
I want to explore an issue that Evelyn Tweed raised. We know that a lot of effort is put into thinking about procurement as delivering positive social, economic and environmental outcomes, as well as providing the goods and services that you all need to fulfil your functions. I am curious as to how you see those outcomes being set and determined, and about your role as procuring agents in those discussions.
Do you have clear lines of conversation with other agencies or internally in your organisations on how you can use your procurement power to tackle gender inequality, for instance? How do you see the setting or aspiration of the procurement outcomes that are not about service delivery or getting the stuff that you need?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful, thank you.
You have all talked about the need for internal consistency with regard to training and awareness raising to ensure that people understand the idea of trying to procure for good. This might be a difficult question to answer briefly, but how often do you find that the positive outcomes that we have been talking about—the promotion of ethical goods, fair work and gender equality, the reduction of inequality and so on—are sacrificed because of cost? Also, how much of that sacrifice could be allayed by the improved consistency and coherence of training and awareness raising with regard to the longer-term social and environmental benefits of procurement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
Great—thanks.
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
How would you decide how to weight those different considerations? Are you saying, “Right, in this works contract, we really need these social or environmental outcomes”? You said that you might write such considerations into the contract, but how else might you determine exactly the sort of fluffy outcomes that you are looking for?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
The issue of availability and collection of data will be a thread throughout this inquiry, I think. Would it be helpful if there was a standardised approach to data collection so that you did not have to have that conversation individually every time you have initial discussions with potential contractors and suppliers? If there was something that set out the data that you have and how you want it to be recorded for the contract, would that make things easier, or would that just be too cumbersome a machine?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have a similar question for Craig Fergusson. Within the community wealth building framework and the pillars that you talked about, do you find it challenging to track the social, environmental and other outcomes of your procurement spend? What other barriers prevent us from getting the social or environmental outcomes that we might wish to get, given the current procurement set-up?