The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
You have both talked about poverty and financial and economic inequality as well—it is about being able to track back through all those factors.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have similar questions for you, Rory O’Connor, about groups that we know, from the data, to be at high risk. Do we necessarily understand why? I am not asking specifically about neurodivergent people, but you mentioned them in particular.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
I come to Jane Bray with a similar question on targeting groups. Have we identified the right groups, and are we getting that right?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
This is my final question, because I know that other people want to come in on monitoring. It is about something a bit less tangible and perhaps harder to quantify and collect data for—the kind of intergenerational risks that are associated with conflict. As more and more of that is experienced not only in our own society but elsewhere, do we have an understanding of people who have lived in conflict societies and the impact that that has on them post-conflict? The impact could be felt decades later.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
It is just too hard.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Murray Smith, I want to put the same question to you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, both. Thank you for your comments so far, and for joining us this morning. I will talk a little bit about some of the different groups that are perhaps disproportionately affected.
Hazel Marzetti, you mentioned in your opening comments the very clear recognition in the strategy and in your research of the impacts that LGBTQIA+ communities face. Can you say a little bit more about why it is so important that the strategy recognises the disproportionate effects on different groups? Have we got the strategy right, now?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for being with us this morning and for your comments so far.
I want to follow on from Evelyn Tweed’s questions about groups of people who might be disproportionately affected by suicide or the experience of suicide. I have a general question to start off with. Do the strategy and the action plans and the thinking around them sufficiently address the needs of people who we know are in high-risk groups?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
In your opening remarks, you commented on Dundee and the issues of deprivation there. Dundee is Scotland’s drug death capital and is closely associated with drug and alcohol misuse and with suicide. Do we adequately understand the socioeconomic causes of that? We have spoken about resources, the cost of living crisis and all those things. Do we need to do more to focus on that aspect?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Maggie Chapman
My final question is probably for Amy Knighton and Murray Smith again. In your respective roles as members and representatives of your royal colleges, given that you are front-line primary care providers, are you concerned for your fellow workers in this space?
You have talked about additional pressure and not being able to do what you want to do because you do not have the time, the capacity or the resource. Are we not paying enough attention to the consequential impact of that? If any of you or your colleagues are not there, that only exacerbates the problem for everybody else. Are we missing that important aspect? Perhaps Amy Knighton can answer that.