The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1450 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I am sorry; I mean the group that put together the recovery plan.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Were there any staff from below university executive level?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
What is the headline risk in your risk register?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
So, it is not insolvency.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I understand that, and you have answered some of those questions previously. However, the University of Dundee, like any higher education institution in Scotland, is required to comply with the duties that are laid out in the public sector equality duty. What equality impact assessment has been done on the recovery plan?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
In your opening remarks, you said that this is not a recent problem but something that has crept up as a result of mistakes and poor decisions that have been made over some time. At previous restructuring points in 2015 and 2021, equality impact assessments noted a disproportionate impact on people with protected characteristics. What actions were taken to remedy those impacts at those times? What lessons have been learned in the work that you and your colleagues have undertaken in the past four months?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Staff and students have been watching these proceedings live, and several of us will have got different emails over the course of the morning. I have just received one that I want to quote from. It says that
“as of next week”—
that is, the week beginning 24 March—
“staff members will find out if they will still have a job. yet there is no”
voluntary severance
“scheme and today they are saying that they will come up with another recovery plan in the next 2 weeks. it’s conflicting information”.
Can you confirm today that there will be no announcement of staff redundancies, voluntary or otherwise, next week?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
In response to Michael Marra’s questions, you promised to produce a document in a couple of weeks. Will there be an equalities impact assessment in that document?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
This will be my final question. Professor O’Neill, in response to an earlier question, you said that the university executive is the right team to see the university through this crisis. What response did you give to the overwhelming vote of no confidence in your leadership that happened just before Christmas?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I will pick up on the idea of risk assessments. I am actually quite staggered that student numbers were assessed as green until they were red. Do you need to reassess how you calculate and identify risk appetite?