The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
You make the link very clearly between an individual taking a case and the systemic issues for the betterment of society in many ways. You talked about that earlier and I think that that link is important to highlight.
I ask the same question to Hyo Eun Shin about where the burden of court costs should lie. Has the Scottish Government got this right or not?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Does the loss of the project funding have a disproportionate or asymmetric impact on rural communities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Patrick or Julie, do you want to come in on the types of cases that might be most affected?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I will shift the topic a wee bit to funding for advice projects. The question is probably mostly for Aaliya and Hyo as CAS and SALC both have experience of the Scottish Legal Aid Board’s funding of advice projects. We know that the early resolution and advice programme stream 2 funding is coming to an end at the end of this month. Can you say a bit more about what you think the impact of that will be? We have already talked about the geographical inequality of the central belt versus more rural areas. Aaliya, I will come to you first. What will be the impact of the loss of that advice project funding on people’s ability to access justice?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the panel. Thank you very much for your contributions this morning. I take very clearly the message that you have all given about being opposed to these increases. I am interested in your views on where you think the burden of payment for court processes should lie. Do you agree with the Scottish Government that there should be some element of user payment as part of this? I will come to Aaliya Seyal first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Many of us in this place are pretty scunnered at the lack of a human rights bill and incorporation of UN treaties into Scots law. I get that very clear connection and the different position that we find ourselves in.
To pick up on a point about accountability and who will do this work, do you consider that your proposed disability commissioner will have the resources to do that? Given the systemic failures that you have well outlined, if the role is pan-disability, will one person be sufficient?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
When we heard from the minister, she spoke about mainstreaming. We heard in other evidence—you will have picked this up as well—about some of the tensions around mainstreaming, including with regard to intersectionality. I suppose that this follows on from my other questions. How would a disability commissioner deal with every aspect of a disabled person’s life in every aspect of society? How would we get those levels of accountability in the powers of one office?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, Mr Balfour. Thank you for your opening comments and for the time that you have previously given me to discuss your bill. It is much appreciated.
I hear clearly from you this morning and from previous evidence the concerns with the disability equality strategy and your point about how we will get action if not through a disability commissioner. How do you approach the inherent tension in what we have heard about the need for a disability commissioner to focus on disabilities and the huge range of disability issues that people face? You talked about focusing on issues such as education, employment and social care. Why is a commissioner the answer, rather than using existing structures to focus on mainstreaming or on employability for everyone?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. In many ways, my questions follow on from those that were put to you by Evelyn Tweed.
You have talked about the potential to give existing bodies—or existing structures—more teeth if we do not go down the line of having a disability commissioner. Given our persistent failure to deal with the stark inequalities that are faced by disabled people, which Evelyn outlined, is there any value in having such a role, whether it be that of a disability commissioner, specifically, or something with a stronger mandate to tackle these matters? In earlier responses, you talked about having a balance across all organisations and mentioned the SHRC’s concern that this commissioner, as outlined, would be more powerful than it was. Given the failures to address disability inequality, do you think that we need more clout specifically in this area?