The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, folks. I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, panel, and thank you for joining us. I am sorry not to be with you in person. My question follows on from Lewis Ryder-Jones’s points about policy coherence. Catherine Robertson mentioned in her opening remarks the need for policy coherence and said that the NPF’s effectiveness could be undermined by a lack of that. I am interested in your views on whether, with the NPF and whatever outcomes come out of it after the review, we will have the capabilities and the equipment to tackle inequalities, given our failings on policy coherence to date. Does Catherine Robertson want to pick that up first?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful—thank you. Does Lewis Ryder-Jones have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I will pick up on one point and explore it a bit further. You talked about some of the ambitions. A lot of hope from across civil society and different sectors was pinned on the human rights legislation. Given that we seem to have lost that galvanising force because the legislation is not being brought forward, how do you see human rights in the NPF? What are the risks for the framework and for actually tackling equalities and human rights injustices?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I come to Catherine Murphy with a similar question. Given policy coherence failures, how well equipped is the NPF to tackle inequalities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
One of the things that the Scottish Government committed to doing for this coming year’s budget was exactly that—raising awareness of the EFSBS, but also gearing the process of making budget decisions towards tackling inequality. Given what you have said about the impact assessments, do you fear, or are you concerned, that unless the impact assessments improvement programme tackles the issue of timescales—doing the work before the budget decisions are made—we will not see the benefits of the information?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I want to understand a bit more the tracker tool that you referred to in your opening remarks. You talked about using the time between now and the election in 2026 to build the capacity of those in the public sector to collect data and understand their obligations and duties, and to develop a tracker that would allow us to monitor our performance against international treaty obligations. Will you say a bit more about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister, and thank you for the letter that you sent last week and for your statement this morning. I will ask a couple of questions to delve into the costs in a bit more detail. You mentioned in your statement the cost recovery figure falling to 57 per cent. The most recent figure that I could find was for 2017, when cost recovery was 87 per cent. It seems to me that more than just inflation is going on. Can you say a bit more about that change?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I appreciate what you say, but at no point in the past three years has inflation approached 20 per cent. Even if the fees are lower in absolute terms, it is a pretty steep increase. I do not see evidence for that increase. The consultation document talks about CPI being 5.4 per cent last year and 0.6 per cent this year, and the retail prices index being 8.1 per cent last year and 1.2 per cent this year—those are the Scottish Government’s figures in its consultation document. Given that we have already had a 2 per cent rise this year, I do not see how we can justify a 20 per cent in-year increase.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have a final question—well, maybe it is a statement rather than a question. Last week, we were told by people who support citizens who are seeking justice that quite a lot of them fall through the cracks of legal aid. You said that, if people are struggling, they will be covered by legal aid, but they are often not covered by legal aid, either because the professionals do not exist in areas where they are needed or because people need to travel to find that legal aid support. Therefore, I am sorry, but I simply do not agree that legal aid provides the cushion that you have claimed that it does, given how patchy access to legal aid is across Scotland.