The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1459 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Before I come to John Greenall, I will add something to the question around the potential impact not only on religious practices or what may be excluded from any ban. I am thinking about medical practitioners in your position in the organisation that you are here to represent. What might be the impact on the type of therapy provided by medical practitioners to someone—adult or child—who has concerns about their sexuality or gender identity? What are the potential impacts, and would you see any of those therapies being excluded?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to all the panellists. You have all, in different ways, expressed concerns about the potential criminalisation of pastoral care, prayer and those kinds of things. The United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief has said that there is no conflict between the right to freedom of religion or belief and the obligation of the state to protect the life, dignity, health and equality of LGBT+ people. We have just heard quite a lot about definitions. What exceptions, if any, do you think should be defined in order to protect religious freedoms?
I will go to Piers first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
I am interested in hearing what Peter has to say, but I am curious about the research that Piers referenced. He said that, in the vast majority of cases, no harm had been done. However, the state has an obligation to protect those in the minority of cases in which harm is caused. That is what we are seeking to work our way through.
Does Peter want to respond to that question, too?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
I thank Christine Ryan and Adam Jowett for their evidence. I have a couple of questions for each of them.
The first is for Christine. You clearly articulated three points that we have to bear in mind when considering what approach to take in legislation and more broadly. I am interested in the second point. To paraphrase, you said that legislation and regulation are all well and good, but that there is a broader cultural question for us to consider about how we ensure that our obligation to protect people’s dignity and individual rights applies across all aspects of society. Can you say a little more about that from a legal point of view? How much of that can we write into legislation, and how much of it has to come as a kind of wraparound thing that involves cultural change?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that was really helpful.
Adam, could you give us a bit more detail on elements of your research? How do you see those elements being translated into the legislation that is proposed in England and Wales? How might they be applied in Scotland?
We have heard hints that there are differences between the form, and people’s experiences, of conversion practices that relate to gender identity and those that relate to sexual orientation. Did your research uncover any such distinctions, or are we safe to take gender identity and sexual orientation together? Linked to that is the question of consent and the differences between adults and children in that regard. Could we hear your thoughts on those issues, please?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that is really helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I think that Pam Duncan-Glancy covered affirmative spaces and affirmative action previously.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Paul. I do not think that I have time to give anybody else the opportunity to come in, so I will hand back to the deputy convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for joining us.
I have a couple of questions. One is about automation and the links to labour and logistics; the other is about skills, collaboration and planning around collaboration.
There has been a lot of chat about the risks and opportunities of automation for not only labour markets but supply chains. Could you say a little about how ready you think we are and what we need to do? We have heard some discussion about planning and our need to plan, but what does that planning look like? There is a lot of talk about planning, but we do not know what that means.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Maggie Chapman
My next question is on collaboration. We have heard a little bit about the importance of collaboration and that we are not doing that effectively. With regard to the city region deals, have we missed a trick around the interaction between industry, academia, local government and the Scottish Government? What can you, as industry and academia, do, and what can we as the Parliament do, to ensure that we get effective collaboration? I go to Mark Logan first.