The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
We have got a lot of work to do, and a lot of culture change to get on with. Thank you, convener; I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, Pauline and Jenny, and thank you very much for joining us and for your opening remarks. The statements and testimonies that you have given us are very powerful.
Jenny, I will come to you first. I am interested in exploring some of the physical and mental consequences of the pandemic for people’s wellbeing. You talked about deterioration in physical and mental wellbeing. Can you say a bit more about the health impacts that you saw in the carers whom you support?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for that information. To build on Michelle Thomson’s questions, I too, in reading your annual report, picked up on the phrase
“updating legacy IT systems and evolving our IT estate onto a long-term sustainable basis.”
You talked about the two sets of contractors that you currently have: those who are working on the new systems that you are developing, who will not be needed in the long term; and the “keeping the show on the road” folk, whom you want to bring in-house as ROS employees. I understand that, and I take on board your comments to Michelle Thomson.
I am interested in the updating process. From what you have said, and from what I have read in the documentation, that has been going on for a while. How are you managing that process alongside the aspects that Claire Baker asked about—the actual work of ROS and managing the arrears? How do you see the balance of risk and resource allocation between those two aspects?
Thinking about the longer term, I note that you talked about bringing down the cost of contractors in the future. In mapping, certain things can change very quickly. Are you certain that you will have resources available when you need them? I am thinking about the skills and expertise that you may not want to keep in-house, but for which you will need contractors in the future. How is that playing out in your mapping for future financing and resourcing?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for your opening remarks. I have a couple of questions about safeguards.
You talked about, and listed quite clearly, the safeguards to prevent unlawful sharing of data. Given what has been in the media recently about the Post Office scandal and the incorrect data and software malfunction that led to many convictions, what safeguards are in place to ensure that the data that is stored and shared is correct in the first place? As an extension of the safeguards, what opportunities will there be for debtors to know who has that data, when that data is shared, how long it is kept and whether they can challenge that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much.
Convener, I have finished my questions, but I know that Farah Farzana, Trishna Singh and Joy Lewis want to come in. Is it okay if I bring Farah in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much for that, Farah. Trishna, you wanted to come in on this.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Trishna, and thanks for that link. One of my colleagues will probably want to come in on that later. Joy Lewis, did you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much, Mariam. That was helpful and interesting. I am especially struck by your point about undocumented workers, all the added complexities of that situation and the cracks that they fall through anyway. When the pandemic is added to that, the difficulties are magnified and exacerbated.
Sara Medel Jiménez, you talked about women being seen as a soft touch. To what extent was that magnified during the pandemic? I see in the chat that a couple of other people want to come in, but I invite Sara to go first. Do you want to say a bit more about that, partly in answer to my original question but also on the soft target element that you spoke about in your opening comments?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Farah, would you like to respond?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for being with us—I appreciate that juggling various things is not easy. I appreciate the time that you have taken to give evidence to the committee.
I have a couple of questions about the disproportionate impact of Covid on women, and BAME women in particular, which has been reported in the media and which many of you have mentioned. I am interested in understanding the complexities of the issue, including how BAME women have experienced disproportionate susceptibility to Covid and disproportionate financial burdens.
I think that it was Mariam Ahmed who talked about digital poverty, a lack of digital connectivity and the knock-on consequences, so I will come to her first. Could you say a bit more about the personal experiences of some of the women you support whom Amina has worked with? What were those women’s experiences of the lockdown and the restrictions that were placed on society as a whole from the point of view of their ability to maintain any kind of work-life balance and, importantly, the impact on their mental health?
I have another question, which I will ask after we have heard from Mariam.