The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Can I clarify something? You just mentioned clarity around definition—definition of what?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
To be clear, are you talking about the impacts on policy making and data collection rather than the impact on trans people themselves?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks for that, Vic. Do you have anything to add, Mhairi?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Mhairi, are you happy with that, too?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
This is my last question, unless I am allowed a cheeky extra one. The Scottish Human Rights Commission has written to the EHRC to clarify mandates. As you will know, the SHRC suggests that the EHRC is required to seek the consent of the SHRC when it proposes to take action on devolved human rights matters, and we would see gender recognition reform as one such matter. Can you outline that process? Have the two organisations met? What discussions have you had with the SHRC, and has there been an explicit discussion about seeking consent when taking action on devolved human rights matters?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. That is helpful. I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
I just want to come back to a couple of things and explore them in a bit more detail.
Alexander Stewart mentioned the letter that the EHRC wrote to the cabinet secretary, setting out the change in your position. That letter refers to a
“wider group who identify as the opposite gender at a given point”,
and expresses concern that, under the bill’s proposals, that “wider group” might be able to obtain a GRC. Can you explain the term “wider group”?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
I invite Euan Leitch to respond on the same issues.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Adrian Watson, I would like you to address the same issues, but also to touch on funding. Is there scope for central funding to support local organisations and communities to do some of the visioning work that Craig McLaren talked about? Is there also scope to provide, if not a centralised resource, somewhere where communities and local authorities could at least access the skills and knowledge that they need? You mentioned that there is a lack of skills in Aberdeen City Council because people are retiring. Will you say a little bit more about that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for your comments so far. I want to dig a bit deeper on issues such as master planning and local development plans, which were discussed earlier.
Craig McLaren talked about town centres needing to be places where people want to be. That needs to apply to a range of people: to go back to one of Michelle Thomson’s points, all people need to feel safe. What do you think about the value of local development plans? How important should they be? How do we link the different master planning and visioning exercises? How do we feed those into development plans in a robust way that means that developers cannot override them and things cannot be changed on what often appears to be a whim?
It is crucial in this whole process that we ensure that we are listening to the right people rather than taking a majoritarianism approach, so that we develop places where everyone wants to be, not just the people with loud voices, those who have resources or those who have access to having their voices heard.