The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the panel. I thank you for joining us, and for your opening statements and the written materials that you provided in advance. I have a couple of questions around the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria and the medical panel that is in place under the current legislation.
Perhaps I can come to Anthony Horan first. You talked about the higher level of suicidal ideation and the negative health impacts that many members of the trans community experience disproportionately in comparison with the broader population. You can correct me if I am wrong, but I think that you said something along these lines: that you would not want to see a lessening of engagement with, or connection to, the medical profession or the psychiatric profession, and that you would therefore like that panel to be retained. Did I understand you correctly there? However, we have heard from people who have been through that process that they never actually speak to the panel. There is not the patient-doctor relationship, or the supportive relationship, that you might expect. There is just a body of evidence that is sent to, and then assessed by, what is, for the trans person—to be frank—an anonymous panel.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Great; thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
You said that it is an effective means of engaging people in policy making. Does that link to your point about, in essence, what data is for? We use data in order to inform and change society for the better, rather than its having any intrinsic value in and of itself. Is that more or less what you are saying?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
That is very helpful. I completely understand that you cannot go into the analysis of recommendations, because you are not yet at that stage.
When the review was kicked off, paused and restarted, was there any sense that there needed to be a radical change to a multidisciplinary, holistic risk assessment process as part of the policy, or was the review just looking at how things could be better generally?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I accept that members of the trans community have high levels of suicidal ideation, but I do not attribute that to the lack of contact with a medical panel as in the current process. I attribute it to transphobia within society more broadly.
If that diagnosis of gender dysphoria is required, how would you see the GRC process applying to trans people who do not experience gender dysphoria?
11:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Diagnosis itself is a current requirement so it does not capture those who do not experience gender dysphoria. The current system therefore does not serve a proportion of the trans community who do not have that diagnosis, which means that we are not supporting them at all through the current process, and I view that as problematic. Given the lack of engagement of the panel with the individual, that medical support is not there. I agree that support needs to be provided, but I am not sure that using this process is the appropriate way.
Karen, I will come to you on this. Is it your clear position that the diagnosis of gender dysphoria is problematic? You have stated that you welcome its removal. What do you see as being legitimate or necessary evidence or criteria for the new process?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I will come to you, finally, Fraser Sutherland. In your opening remarks, you said that autonomy is really important. How do you see that medicalisation of the process interacting with the notion of autonomy, if at all?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Do you anticipate that you will determine what to include once the bill is at stage 3? In any process, will you seek clarification around, for example, any evidence that is required?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Kate Coleman, you mentioned in your opening statement that the requirement of gender dysphoria should remain. Is your view aligned with what Lucy Blackburn Hunter and Susan Smith have just said?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
But sexual health is different from mental disorder.