The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
That links to the point that you have made a few times about visions for places and ensuring that people who live, work, study and play in places are involved in generating a vision for them.
We heard about a couple of challenges with that. One of them is the lack of expertise and capacity, to which a potential solution would be to have a central resource of expertise and support that could be mobilised to different parts of the country at different times to support communities to develop. There have been discussions about that; I am not sure that proceeding with it is the settled view of the committee, but I am interested to hear your thoughts on it.
One of the other challenges we have heard about, which is linked to that, is that when funding is available for visioning projects it is often short term. Where funding has been successful, projects have been given a pot of money without the provider knowing what the end product will be. On such projects there is trust and the community is given freedom to run with them—sometimes they do so for 10 years. That would be a marked shift in how we support community visioning projects. What is your perspective on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, Tom, and thank you for being here and for what you have said so far.
I want to explore a couple of areas, the first of which is community engagement. In your opening remarks, you said that you see town centres as being at the heart of decision making. What do you mean by that? How can we make it happen?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for that. You have talked about engaging with the community, but how we define the community matters. There will be competing and conflicting definitions or qualifying criteria, in that respect.
One of the things that we have heard about is a potential lack of capacity in some areas to ensure community engagement and direct community involvement in planning and, indeed, democracy. The situation varies considerably across Scotland. What possibilities for supporting capacity building in, say, community councils or development trusts can the committee think about? Are there different ways of bringing people in? How do we ensure that we engage with the community as a whole, and not just with those who have vested interests, loud voices or deep pockets?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you; that was helpful. There is a tension between financial support and other support for capital projects, as you mentioned. There is also something about financing and supporting the process of determining projects in the first place, which is often where there are gaps or weaknesses. I will leave it there for now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I know that my colleagues around the table will come back on certain points that you made in that answer.
I will turn to Karon Monaghan. I listened to your opening remarks and I am interested in your thoughts on the medicalisation process. Do you agree that medicalisation of gender dysphoria is problematic and do you see the shift away from requiring that diagnosis as necessary?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I note the evidence that you gave in Westminster in February 2021 when you said very similar things. When you talk about gatekeeping and safeguards, what kinds of things do you have in mind?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I have a couple of questions. First, will you give us a flavour of the support for trans people and others that the clinics provide, so that we know what you do?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I will come back on a couple of things. In a lot of what we have heard, the assumption is that we are always talking about trans women; we must recognise that trans men exist, too, and Sharon Cowan mentioned non-binary people in her opening remarks. In relation to what you say about gender dysphoria and the medicalisation of it, given that the World Health Organization has reclassified it and there is increasing evidence that not all trans people experience gender dysphoria, how can we retain a restriction that excludes trans people from getting a GRC?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I suppose that there are no other identities that we may have as human beings and that are currently recognised by the Equality Act 2010 that require gatekeeping in that way.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
One issue in relation to the panel requiring evidence to be submitted to prove that you are who you say you are is that the process is intrusive. Surely trans people deserve privacy, too.