The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Given what you say, which is a welcome clarification, it will be possible to identify the types of behaviour that are connected with the use of a cell as a place of safety. Will it be possible to identify the types of behaviour that are associated with other places of safety?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for your opening comments and your answers so far to Colin Smyth’s questions.
I want to pick up on staffing and seek a little bit of clarity. I understand what you say about the assumptions, and that there are a lot of unknowns in your current processes and thinking. In the corporate plan you have “Now,” “Next” and “Future” plans for staff. Is it the case that the “Future” plan—which mentions registrations, new services, digital, data and corporate services—will become a reality only once you have dealt with the backlog, so the “Next” plan is the transitional phase?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
I would like to unpick, to understand a little bit. You talked in your answers to Colin Smyth about automation and the need, therefore, to shift skills into digital. What is the difference between the staffing that you will need in digital services—I assume that that will support automated registration—and in the new services that you have outlined?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
I think you said that the “Future” plan is three years or thereabouts. Is that right?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
That does help. Thank you.
You moved on to talk about contractors. How many contractors do you currently have and how do you see that situation developing, given that some of those things take time, which is unclear or undefined at the moment? How many contractors are currently employed by ROS? What is your ideal, in terms of a reduction, over the next five years?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
I asked a question about staff morale.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
How is the “Grow our own” approach going? I presume that that is where the bulk of the work is happening. What impact is that having on these two elements: projected costs for your overall salary spend and associated costs, and staff morale?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
By way, I hope, of helpful explanation, at the moment only one person in a couple can get a gender recognition certificate. This will enable both to get GRCs.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
I will start again. I have a couple of questions around the removal of the diagnosis of gender dysphoria and about the gender recognition panel.
First, on gender dysphoria, you talked in your opening remarks about the shift away from treating being trans as a mental health condition. Where does the importance of that lie in relation to separating legal transition from medical transition?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
Maggie Chapman
We have heard evidence from people who are concerned that removal of the diagnosis potentially opens up the process of applying for a GRC to a wider group of people, including people who might be bad-faith actors. There are also concerns about whether removal of the medical diagnosis takes away from the seriousness of the decision. What are your comments on that?