The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Would you like guidance to be addressed in the discussions that are happening about the PSED reform?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I am going to shift focus a bit. A lot of our conversation has been around discrimination and the needs to eliminate discrimination and to advance equalities. Jatin Haria, right at the start, you talked about the potential conflict between the three needs in the Equality Act 2010 and the operational duties. The third need—fostering good relations—often gets overlooked. It is something that we are missing, both in the broader conversation about the public sector equality duty and in the proposed reforms. Do you think that public bodies understand what it means to foster good relations? How can we ensure that that need is taken as seriously as it should be?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
The frustration that you and Rohini Sharma Joshi feel comes out quite strongly in what you said.
Vic Valentine, given that the PSED is not delivering, what are the barriers and the failures?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I ask the same question of Clare Gallagher.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Thanks. Lindsey Millen, I ask you the same question on fostering good relations.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much, Clare.
Jatin, you said that
“the point of having the public sector equality duty was to change people’s lives, but that has been missing”.
That is a very stark statement that we, in this committee, should take seriously. Is your view similar to Clare’s—that the reason for that is the gap between process and outcome—or is something else going on, as well?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Rohini. Vic, will you comment on fostering good relations? Where do you see the barriers and the opportunities? Is any work happening in that area?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is pretty stark and, arguably, pretty damning, given how long the duties have been in place.
On the second and third needs, I take the point about “advancing equality” being lesser, but do both “advancing equality” and “fostering good relations” need to become much more prominent in the Scottish Government’s work on current and future reviews and the public sector equality duty, given the level of hate crime, the rise of the far right and the undermining of equality and diversity work that is happening across the board and not just in Scotland? Does there need to be more focus on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the witnesses. Thank you for joining us this morning and for your comments so far.
You have all identified a gap between process and outcomes, and a failure to understand the connections. Given that one of the reasons for this inquiry is the lack of other levers to consider changing outcomes and making human rights and equalities real for people, where are the failures in that implementation gap? We have talked a bit about understanding, but we also heard questions about lack of accountability and leadership. Why does the public sector equality duty as we have it now not work? Rohini Sharma Joshi, I will start with you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Rohini, what are your views on Age Scotland’s understanding of, or work with, the third need of fostering good relations?