Seòmar agus comataidhean

Back in 2020-21, £20 million was committed. If that money was not spent, I presume that it does not come to you, as much as you would like it to; it would probably just drift back into the Government’s coffers for it to spend on anything that it likes.

Following on from the deputy convener’s questions, I note that David Harley mentioned that 60 per cent of the material in residual waste could be recycled. I think that we are going the wrong way with regard to recycling, but I guess that we do not need to wait for the legislation to be in place before we consider initiatives. What could we do now to try to improve our recycling rates?

The problem is that there is still inconsistency across different parts of Scotland, especially in relation to food waste, which some local authorities collect and others do not. That all has an impact on what ends up in the general waste bin.

You mentioned a lack of facilities for plastic. I presume that all our PET gets shipped to other parts of the UK or elsewhere. There might have been a lack of investment, but that sort of thing can happen now. Once again, there is no need to wait for a bill to be introduced.

The concern may be that there is no detail as yet.

NatureScot has been trying to move to a full recovery model for licensing. Can you give us an update on that, Nick? Have you been talking to SEPA about its approach to see whether there is anything to learn there?

I am moving on to peatland restoration. Three years ago, the Scottish Government committed to spending £250 million over a 10-year period. How much of that has been spent to date? Can you give us that figure?

The situation is different in different parts of Scotland. Iain Gulland probably knows more about that.

My last question is about labelling. Should more be done about that? I know that there is some labelling but, once again, it all depends on where you are in the country whether you can recycle certain things.

The recycling of Pringles tubes is an example.