The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1548 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that it is a balancing act for the Government. It wants to give communities the right to buy, but there could be unintended consequences.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I thank the committee for the opportunity to come and speak to you today and note that the petition—like the one that you dealt with previously this morning—has been on-going for more three years and during the time of three First Ministers.
The convener mentioned the current consultation between the United Kingdom and Scottish Governments on proposals for electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland. I fear that the direction that we are going in is the opposite to what the petitioner would hope for, and I think the proposals are an attack on local devolution and an attempt to ensure that electricity infrastructure projects, wind farms, pylons and substations are railroaded through against the will of local communities. Those dangerous proposals are basically Scottish ministers telling local communities, “We don’t care what you think; we’re going to push the proposal forward anyway.”
At present, when locally elected planning authorities object to proposals, that causes a public inquiry. The new proposals would change all that, so that an objection would trigger Scottish ministers to appoint someone to examine the application and to decide whether further evidence is required. The stated purpose of the changes is to speed up the consenting process, but that would undermine the voice of local communities who want to speak against detrimental changes to our rural communities, many of which are in the North East.
This seems more and more like a David versus Goliath scenario. Communities are finding it harder and harder to fight against proposals from energy generating companies because the legal costs make it difficult to fight generating companies, which have very deep pockets. The reduced timeframes that are proposed would make it harder for communities to fight, given that the generating companies have paid staff who can work to tight timescales. The erosion of decisions made by locally elected authorities will make it harder for communities to fight planning applications. It seems more and more as if the system is rigged against local communities. I understand that our energy system is changing, but those changes must be made with communities, not done to them.
We are in danger of destroying our countryside forever. When we look at pictures of our cities and see a place where a once-magnificent building has been demolished and some concrete thing has been put up in its place, we think, “How on earth did they get planning permission to do that?” In years to come, when we look back at what has happened to our countryside, people will ask, “How on earth did they get permission to do that?” It will be because of people, probably in Edinburgh, deciding that they know better than our rural communities.
I urge the committee to press the Government to ensure that our communities are heard, that we listen to those communities and do not press forward with some of these infrastructure projects. We might think that they are the right thing to do just now, but they will have a long-lasting effect that we will probably never be able to overturn.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
No—I was actually just talking about onshore.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
But does it enable a route to having separate policies from the rest of the UK?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I wish to follow on from Bob Doris’s questions and to work out how things could work in practice, Deputy First Minister.
Let us say that either the present Government or a future Government wanted to have a policy of having all power lines offshored or put underground, for instance. Would what we are putting in place through the SI make it easier for a Government to change the regulations to put that policy in place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Hello, everyone. Do your existing roles represent any potential conflicts of interest, and if so, how might those be mitigated so that you can maintain an objective approach to your work and cross-sectoral support? Was that discussed at the interview panel?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Would bringing back that power not allow you to have a separate assessment, to align with the Government’s political priorities?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Thanks, convener. I will leave it there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Still on the topic of the community right to buy process, I have a question that follows on from Mark Ruskell’s question. Are the pre-notification and registration provisions unnecessarily complex and difficult to navigate? Are they likely to act as a deterrent to communities?
I invite Linda Gillespie to kick off on that.