The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1548 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
If the data is there, it would be good to see it.
I will change the subject. What is the exact remit of the citizens assembly on local government funding?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That takes me back to my earlier question. Will non-domestic rates be part of the remit?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That is not a timescale, minister. It almost feels as if the can is being kicked down the road.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you for your presentation this morning, Callum. I really enjoyed it. One of my concerns about the environmental fiscal measures is about the possibility of there being a disproportionate effect on some of our rural communities. I am thinking about the possibility of people in those areas having a greater reliance on private transport, but the issue is also relevant to public transport. It probably has a larger carbon footprint in rural areas than it does in the central belt because ferries are mainly diesel powered, because of the diesel high-speed trains that people depend on, and because air travel is important to some of our island communities. How can we ensure that anything that we introduce does not hit rural areas disproportionately?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
My other question is about the transient visitor levy. In your report, you refer to an “environmental tourism tax”. I have been a councillor for the past five years, and the TVL has been a difficult sell to many in the hospitality industry. One way round the issue is to say that all money that is raised will be reinvested in tourism to try to grow the industry. There seems to be a change, and the carrot has changed into a stick. Is that fair?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thanks for that. As you say, we have to ensure that people in those areas are not disproportionately impacted.
With regard to energy from waste, you mentioned that we are not in quite as good a place as we thought that we were. Is a review being done of where we are with energy from waste? Should a moratorium be put in place until we have evaluated it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I suppose that it would be better if we managed to get all the plastics out of that waste and met our recycling targets. That would make energy from waste better for the environment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Yes. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Does Emma Congreve have a view on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Following on from Liz Smith’s questions, am I right in thinking that this all comes down to our predicting the amount of money that we get back to be lower? If so, is that because our economic performance turned out not to be as good as we thought it might be? Is it fair to say that?