The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1548 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
To go back to the point about the golden thread and local authorities, you mentioned the North Ayrshire Council submission. We also had a submission from Fife Council, which said:
“In terms of our funding to the voluntary sector we do not assess grant awards against their contribution to the National Outcomes directly, nor do we map the awards to the National Outcomes that they contribute to.”
I asked the council about that and it said, rightly, that they are mapped against its LOIP instead, and I think that I made the point that—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
They are mapped against the local outcomes improvement plan. I would say that the golden thread still runs through that, because the LOIP has to have due regard to the NPF. However, although third sector organisations will be contributing to the NPF, they might not be aware that they are contributing. Do you see that as a problem? Is it an issue at all?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Would it be a problem if a voluntary organisation was not aware that it was probably making a good contribution to the NPF?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That might tie into what the Auditor General said last year, when he raised issues around accountability and delivery. He said that Scotland is suffering from
“a major implementation gap between policy ambitions and delivery on the ground.”
He went on to say:
“I am not convinced that public sector leaders really feel accountable for delivering change”.
Do you agree?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
My first question is about the green jobs workforce academy. Is there any data yet on how effective that has been and how many people it has helped into new employment, or is it still early days?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
As a last point on that, is there a review of those actions? Does that come back anywhere?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
How do you keep them live? I guess that the documents should be changing quite regularly.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
You have made the point that it is all fine, as long as the LOIP aligns with the NPF. Where is the check and balance done?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
As Liz Smith suggested, is that about looking at how organisations are funded and using the carrot or the stick to make sure that they are aligned to the NPF?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
At present, then, is it more of a signposting website that shows people where green jobs are and where green training is, or is that too simplistic?