The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1548 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you for that clarification.
My next question is on the reaching 100 per cent—R100—project. Obviously there will have been some funding changes in that respect, given the £16 million capital saving on digital projects. What impact will that have on the R100 project? Will it delay the project further?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Is that because there are none in progress or none in progress that would—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Okay.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thanks for that clarification.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Good morning, minister. I will continue with questions on the process that Daniel Johnson talked about.
In our evidence sessions during the past few weeks, SOLACE, COSLA, CIPFA, the NHS, the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland and trade unions have all condemned the approach that has been taken. It sounds like the process has been rushed in this way because there was a commitment to introduce a bill in the first year of this session of Parliament. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Just now, however, we are writing a blank cheque, because we do not know what is coming further down the line.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
None of those groups came to us and said that there should be no change at all. I cannot remember that being said at all. They all said that they accepted change; however, they were protesting against the fact that the bill that has been brought forward has no detail for them to get behind—or not get behind.
Unite the union said:
“The Scottish Government could not have drafted a more incomprehensible, incoherent and dreadful Bill. The plans to transfer services, people and property from local authorities to the Scottish Government are a recipe for disaster and represent an all-out assault on local democracy.”
Do you not accept that the lack of detail is causing those concerns for many organisations across Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Do you not admit that the process that you have followed has caused all that uncertainty? If you had done it the other way round and had the co-design first and then the bill, there would be less uncertainty for groups such as Unite the union.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I will move on to my next point. We mentioned standing orders earlier. According to rule 9.3 of the Parliament’s standing orders, a financial memorandum should set out the
“best estimates of the costs, savings, and changes to revenues to which the provisions of the Bill would give rise”.
We heard earlier that this financial memorandum seems to have more financial holes than a sieve. Is there a possibility that you are breaking the Parliament’s own rules here?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Why is there not? It is known that there will need to be an IT system to support this. You said that you did not want to pluck figures out of the air for an IT system, but figures have been plucked out of the air for every other aspect of the bill. Why could there not have been a best estimate for an IT system?