The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1548 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
Your submission contains some good examples in that respect—you have mentioned the Forth crossing, and another example is Social Security Scotland—but what has been on my mind recently is the proposal for the national care service, in which we are being asked to approve the allocation of quite a lot of money without there seeming to be a business case. Have you in Audit Scotland seen a business case for the national care service, or is that something that has been lacking?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
You talk in your submission about evaluation being carried out post hoc—I think that that was the term that was used.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
So, reducing our waiting lists and getting more people to participate will boost the economy in both ways.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that that would not be explained by people retiring early—unless we were retiring really early.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I want to pick up on a point that Daniel Johnson made earlier about business cases. In your submission, you say:
“Business cases were performed to the minimum standard or missing entirely.”
That links to what Liz Smith said about evaluation. If there is no business case at the start, how can we do an evaluation or a post-implementation review? Why would business cases be missing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
It would make it better for the committee and for the Government to justify the decisions that it has made.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
That normally happens when it goes wrong.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
Processes have to be followed on procurement, for example, but I guess that the process is not clear for other areas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
One of the areas that the committee will be looking at is recording and reviewing decision making. The impression that I got when we had our group exercise was that there were sometimes tools in place for that, but that maybe they are not often used or followed.
Daniel Johnson touched on the issue of ferries. My question is not really about ferries; it is more about recording who made the decision and then being able to review that later. Do you think that the Scottish Government is doing anything better or worse than other Governments on that, or is it doing about the same?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I will pick up on the point that Daniel Johnson was making about the net zero funds. What impact will there be on the climate change targets that the Government has set? There is seemingly a lack of demand for the funds, and they have been cut twice in the past two updates.