Seòmar agus comataidhean

I was not asking for anybody to carry that out. I am probing the understanding of what the corporate body does. The committee has heard significant concerns from members of the corporate body about not only their capacity but the locus that they have to undertake those roles appropriately. They do not have the capacity to do it. It seems to me that, with the commissioners, the thinking is, “We don’t really know where to put this, so it will go there.” The result is that the SPCB role is growing like Topsy, but it does not have the capacity to do it.

It is not everything; I was just saying that there are a few things that have been difficult for the Government that it has parked in this place. Anyway, I will move on.

But the Government must see a limit to that point, where it says that we cannot just continue to bestow functions and responsibilities upon a limited body and ask it to continue undertaking that work for ever.

You have validated that approach and said that it is the right thing for lobbyists and others to advocate for a new commissioner. Is it not the role of the Government to say no?

Thank you for your evidence so far, minister. What is the threshold of public finance that would command your attention?

What is the Government’s and your understanding of the role of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body?

So do you think that the Parliament should get more money and have a higher budget?

But the Parliament says that it does not currently have the capacity to scrutinise the existing commissioners. Should there be more MSPs to do that work?

That is a fine distinction, minister. You mentioned that the Parliament passed a vote, but some of those commissioners were certainly introduced when the Scottish National Party had a majority.

It feels a little bit like the Parliament is the place where difficult things are parked. For instance, last week, we had an amendment from the Government on Michael Matheson’s iPad bill. The amendment was agreed to by Parliament, but it was lodged by the Deputy First Minister. It finished by calling on

“the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body to initiate an independent review of the Parliament’s complaints process to restore integrity and confidence in the Parliament and its procedures.”

That is not anywhere near being within the terms of reference of the corporate body.