Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Criathragan Hide all filters
Displaying 1472 contributions
|
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
I want to stick with the contingency, for the moment. Is that something that you, as Minister for Public Finance, felt had to be created? Have you, as a result of looking over the conduct of previous budgets, decided to create that space in the budget? You have given us some of the rationale behind it, but is it an approach that you have had to push through? Is it a new characteristic of the Government’s handling of budgets?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
My questions also start from the premise that you claimed to have set a balanced budget at the start of last year but you did not.
ScotWind has played the role of a contingency fund for the Government over the past couple of years, according to Gillian Martin and others. We are now told that the money is going to be spent in year. When can we expect those allocations to be made to projects? Over the past year, there has been an underspend against the net zero budget of about £40 million. When will we see the pipeline of projects in the north-east and across the country that will see that money delivering against net zero targets and projects?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
Can we expect that to happen again next year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
So, it makes sense in principle, but how do you see it operating? Would you meet the costs of up-front demand throughout the year then try to replenish the fund through adjustments throughout the year, so that, by the end of the following financial year, you would have had your £350 million? Is that the mechanism that you anticipate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
That is good to hear.
I will close on public sector reform. We have heard about the money that is to be saved and about Minister McKee’s work in that area and the summit that he held this week. You have already set out some useful figures showing projected additional savings of £380 million in the years to come, which is good to hear. Ivan McKee said that the framework for some of that will be delivered near the start of the 2025-26 financial year.
What is the difference between what we are seeing now and the resource spending review that the Government stopped? What do you think is the difference between those two programmes? One was published three years ago. You previously told us, and have said again today, that that was a bit of a blunt tool, so what do you think is the difference between the programme that was put in front of Parliament three years ago and the process that is now being undertaken?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
The committee has been quite clear about our desire to see a directed plan that follows a strategy. The committee is unanimous on that, as is shown in what we have published.
The resource spending review asked for
“investment in systems and processes, with targeted workforce growth in priority areas”,
and said that
“We do not propose a uniform approach due to varying trends in demand for different services.”
The resource spending review acknowledged that there was no global figure for reduction, but that there were specific plans for different areas, which is the same as what is being described now. So, my core question is this: have we just wasted the three years between the publication of that document and where we are now?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
You are the director of public spending for the Scottish Government, Mr McCallum, so you will have a direct insight into this. Is bringing the policy solution and then asking the civil service to cost it up and do it a typical way of developing a policy? Is a more typical way not to go to the civil service and have a discussion about the minister’s intent and what they are seeking to achieve, and for the civil service to then come back with options and say, “These are what we think are the best ways to do it, minister,” so that you can make a decision on that, because you are the Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
Yes, absolutely. One of my concerns is pace and how long it is taking. Children are living in poverty right now, and we want that action to take place as soon as possible. In your response to our report, you said that you considered different options around pace, but you are not setting out any other options to me. You have said one thing here, which is the evidence that you have just given. Were the civil servants involved in the discussions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. I will move on.
We have covered some national insurance issues. There are shared concerns about the impact on the public sector and the private sector. Across the board, it is a real challenge. What would your alternative be for raising the £5.2 billion of extra funding that has come into the budget for Scotland? How should that money have been raised?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Budget Scrutiny 2025-26
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Marra
Much of what you have just said is about further expenditure. My question was about how that money would be raised. The First Minister said that
“the UK Government should have increased income tax”—[Official Report, 14 November 2024; c 13.]
to the level that we have in Scotland. The Fraser of Allander Institute published its analysis of that on 17 January and said that, if what the First Minister had suggested had been done, Scotland’s block grant would have lost £636 million.
