The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1472 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
I am not talking about an institution; I am talking about the sector.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Are there on-going discussions about the sector-wide issue?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
I suppose that its being centralised gives the figure more visibility.
Minister, you came to the committee previously and said that the allocation of £1.43 billion was broadly in line with forecast assumptions. So, the Government was planning on the basis of £1.43 billion broadly but then found itself at the end of the process with a £350 million contingency. How do we marry up those two statements?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
To be fair, minister, that is not the point that I am making and it is not what I am criticising. I am criticising your coming to committee and telling us that that was broadly in line with your forecast assumptions when, in actual fact, you had made very significant in-year cuts to the budget. You then told us that you had assumed that that amount of money was going to come along. We are asking how coherent any of that is as policy making, because it does not feel coherent at all.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
So, did you set out, at the start of this year, planning to create a £350 million contingency fund?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
When Gillian Martin, who is the Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy and your colleague in Cabinet, attended the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 14 January, she said that you had collectively prepared yourselves for a budget settlement that might have meant the use of ScotWind money. On the one hand, we are being told that the planning assumption was in line with and at the top end of the range that you mention, but, on the other hand, we are being told that you expected to get almost none of that money and to have to draw down the ScotWind money, so it is a huge range, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
Gillian Martin pointed out in that committee appearance that you had prepared for that on the basis that you lowballed the pay offer when setting the budget at the start of the year, and you did so in the full knowledge that the money was going to be insufficient.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
I understand that, but—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
On where the money has gone, the Fraser of Allander Institute said on 31 January:
“it does not seem credible that it was in line with ‘internal planning assumptions’, in the context of emergency budget measures prior to the UK Budget”.
The approach that we have ended up with is chaotic, is it not? The budget was set at the start of the year, but there were massive emergency in-year cuts and reallocations within those cuts. You then come to committee and tell us, “We assumed that all that money was coming anyway,” and we find ourselves at the end of the year with a contingency surplus that is going to be held back. On a policy level, that is all over the place—it is up and down and there is no real planning. The approach has just involved waiting for what comes along, has it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Michael Marra
Pace is an issue. We have now known for years that the money is there to be allocated. However, instead of it being spent on net zero projects, realising the employment across the country that is required and getting the supply chain in line, it has been used as a bank account to balance the Scottish Government’s budget. It has been held as a reserve instead of being allocated.
We are now being told that it is going to be allocated, but we have not had any real sight, other than broad headings, of when it will happen. Can we have confidence that it will actually be spent this year? If we do not know what the projects are now, what is the chance that the money will flow through into them this year?