The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1472 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
In your letter to the committee, you are clear that
“funding models based on the acceptance of cross-border children cannot be sustained, and that Scotland must do all it can to prevent the monetisation of the care of our children.”
You have confirmed that. That is a question for both the UK Government, in terms of its actions to provide appropriate care in England, and the Scottish Government in ensuring the security and viability of facilities in Scotland, whether that is based on Scottish children alone, a reduced number of Scottish children or otherwise.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
I appreciate that confirmation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
Do the other witnesses have specific comments about the pandemic?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
I understand what you are saying, but that is quite worrying for me. In essence, it has become a numbers game in terms of inputs: we know that X number of families and children are accessing the provision. However, as a Parliament, how are we supposed to evaluate whether the policy is increasing family resilience, closing the poverty-related attainment gap and supporting parents into work? As the Improvement Service, you might claim that that is not your job and maybe we need to find other people to do that job. Those are the policy intentions, and we need to be able to draw the causal link between the investment and the outcomes, rather than just the inputs.
In answer to Willie Rennie’s questions, you said that you do not really collect that information or assess the policy in that way and that you just look at the numbers. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
I will put roughly the same question to Matthew Sweeney. In COSLA’s view, is the policy about childcare or about education?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
It does—and I appreciate that.
It seems to me that there is some level of conflict between the different outcomes, with the sheer push to increase numbers of hours and the question whether we are providing education or childminding.
I also have a question about the impact of the pandemic, but I am not sure whether you want me to proceed with that now, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
I suppose that part of the issue is the need to think about the unintended consequences. If we are not setting clear parameters for what we hope to achieve—there is a broad range of things that we need to achieve—and we are not measuring our achievements, other than the input targets, that is a problem.
I was interested in the evidence, both written and verbal, that we received from the Scottish Childminding Association, which described the devastation of the childminder service: 1,400 businesses have gone and 8,000 places have gone. That is reflected in the experience of some of my constituents, who have told me that they recognise that that policy is in place but that they still cannot access the wraparound childcare that would allow them to go to work. The flexibility is not available through local authority services or other forms of childcare. Childminders would normally be part of that.
Graeme McAlister, do you see the collapse in the childminder sector as a direct consequence of the implementation of the policy? Is that what you were alluding to earlier?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
Yes. Proceed, and we will see how we go.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
No, I am afraid we cannot hear him.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Michael Marra
I appreciate that. I also recognise that that might be challenging in and of itself. My question was not about whether it would be helpful—