The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1472 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that it was prior to June last year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Mr Irwin?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
You understand where I am going with this. We have a nationalised yard, under the control of ministers, that produces a business plan that says that it will have a direct award, while the civil service is telling the Government that a direct award would be illegal. The Government has agreed both things simultaneously. That is the business plan that stands at the moment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
But, at that point, the OBR was projecting a far higher figure than 3 per cent. The Scottish Fiscal Commission projected 4.5 per cent, because the Scottish Government refused to provide it with the public sector pay policy. After the committee put pressure on the Government to do so, it eventually published the public sector pay policy in May last year, and that showed that there was an assumption of 3 per cent. Was that assumption of 3 per cent not completely unrealistic?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
It is useful to have that comment.
Since then, there has been some evidence that, beyond its being seen as unrealistic now, it was known to be unrealistic at the time, because the external environment made that clear. One of the cabinet secretaries, in evidence to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 14 January, talked about conversations being had in Cabinet about the challenges around public sector pay and their being recognised. Why would you, as the chief financial officer for the Scottish Government, believe that a public pay policy of 3 per cent—a policy whose bandwidth amounts to over 50 per cent of the entire £60 billion-odd budget—was a reasonable assumption at that point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
My question is about the independence of the SFC, which you have mentioned, and it follows on from some of what Craig Hoy said. You say in the report that the nature of the SFC’s work
“and the possibility of a changed political landscape means that tensions could emerge. Were this to become a more significant risk to the effectiveness of the SFC at some point in the future then alternative arrangements should be considered”
around the funding of the institution. Can you say a bit more about what you see as being that “changed political landscape” and where tensions might emerge?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Would you say that the risk is high?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
And has it increased in recent years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
That is useful to know. Your report suggests that the SFC could receive funding directly from the Scottish Parliament rather than the Scottish Government. The committee has done quite a bit of work on directly funded organisations, commissioners and so on. I do not want to put words in people’s mouths, but I would imagine that, for members around the table, the circumstances that you have described might be a concern. Which other models could increase the independence of institutions?