The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1013 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, convener. I have one question and then a supplementary. John, you said in response to my colleague Tess White that the EHRC sent an updated code of practice for services, public functions and associations to the UK Government following the Supreme Court judgment in the For Women Scotland case. Has there been any further update from the UK Government and has there been any engagement with the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes, I am asking whether the commission has changed its position.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Do you have a timetable for that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Do you also understand that you cannot compare apples and pears and that there are some things that you cannot provide services for if you do not have the correct data? Basically, self-ID will screw up the data, especially when it comes to ethnic minorities—people like me. How will you know if females from an ethnic minority are being discriminated against in any way if data on biological sex is not captured? If you use self-ID, people will not have the exact data and would not know what is happening. You talked about the pay gap and other things. Do you not agree that self-ID would muddy the waters?
11:00
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have one last question. I asked the earlier panel a question about data. It was emphasised that there is a big gap in the data and a lot of work needs to be done around it. The need to collect the right data was also emphasised. Do you agree that it is important to be collecting data on biological sex for equality monitoring? Will you be withdrawing the 2021 guidance, which still encourages data collection based on self-ID?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes, thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It was to do with engagement with the Scottish Government.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Absolutely. On those, when I began working on the bill, some of the organisations that also came here to give evidence asked me what I would do in the cases of women who retaliate and what sort of offences the bill would cover. They asked me what would happen if there were blanket offences that covered everybody. That was one area where I really listened to stakeholders and victims to ensure that my bill would make a difference.
Honestly, Ms Mackay, I am open to any amendments and to looking at the thresholds. I know that the committee has discussed whether we should cover only offenders on indictment, only repeat offenders or a lot more people. I am quite open to using the stage 2 and 3 mechanisms.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
A lot of this relates to the process of the Parliament. That is not up to me. If it was, I would probably have put the bill in place a long time ago. There are processes that we must abide by and there are stages and certain things that we have to go through. However, at no point did I slack or think that I should do it only by June when I could have done it earlier. I could not have done anything earlier. I gave it enough time to make sure that every voice was heard and that I had gone through the whole process that the Parliament expected me to. I will pass over to Roz Thomson for information on that process.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I think that it would have a deterrent effect, but there are a number of other things to ensure such an effect. The intention is that victims are kept safe, too. That is a big thing in my bill.