The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 759 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Professor Sullivan, on that point, do you know whether data on bad-faith actors is collected elsewhere or whether things have happened elsewhere? What about the concerns in relation to women of faith?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have one last point on that. Do you believe that it is important that we collect data on bad-faith actors and on women of faith to ensure that nobody is excluded from any service or place, such as those in the health system?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Okay. Could I hear from Barbara, please?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, Cathy. Victor Madrigal-Borloz spoke about how the bill will bring lead to a process of legal recognition that is quick and widely available.
Do you perceive any ripple effects in the future from having more numbers coming through and having a process that is easier to access? Will it have more of an effect on other groups, whether they are minority religious groups or other groups? Do you forecast anything coming up that will open up more issues or around people sounding off about their concerns in relation to the bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, Cathy. Victor—do you have anything to add on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning, panel. Thank you for your opening statements and the evidence that you have provided. I will go a little bit more into what my colleague Maggie Chapman just talked about.
Some of the opposition to the GRA reform has focused on the potential impact on women and girls, particularly in relation to single-sex services and exceptions in the Equality Act 2010. The SHRC submission refers to the “Interdependence of human rights” and states that the rights of women and trans individuals “go hand in hand.”
Will you explain further what that means? Is it possible that the GRA reform will cause conflict between the rights of trans individuals and any other groups, such as religious groups?
I will go to Ian Duddy and Barbara Bolton first. They have talked about what the bill would not touch on.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good afternoon, panel, and thank you for your opening statements. My questions are about the potential for these reforms to allow bad-faith actors to obtain GRCs more easily. The self-ID-based gender recognition system in Victoria, Australia, includes additional checks and safeguards for applicants such as registered sex offenders and prisoners. Are you aware of any other international examples of such additional checks? Do you believe that those additional checks would provide an important additional safeguard?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
You say that a trans woman is a woman and a trans man is a man. How do you feel about religious people—minority groups out there—who feel that their religion will be impacted if somebody else is in that space? We heard in one of our private sessions that that would exclude more women and girls from minority groups. I do not know whether you have an example, but it would be good to hear your thoughts on why minority groups would not be affected if a trans woman came into a changing room, space or service.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have one more question. Are there any international comparisons, whether from Europe or outside Europe, that you have made with regard to religious rights? Obviously we have to ensure that we do not take anyone’s rights away, whether they be trans or religious rights, and that we work in a balanced way. Have you experienced or seen anything out there that you can speak about with regard to balancing both sets of rights, whether it be to single-sex spaces or single-sex services?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning to the panel. Thank you for your opening statements and the information that you have provided. On the back of what my colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy has been talking about, what are your thoughts on the system being open to abuse by bad-faith actors who wish to gain access to single-sex spaces; and what are your thoughts on specific concerns for women of faith?