The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 969 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
You would be guiding them, minister, as the Scottish Government.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Okay. I have a quick, sharp question. It has been almost a year since the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of the word “woman”, yet little progress has been made. Last month, I met with the chief constable, Jo Farrell, who said that Police Scotland did not wait for any guidance from the Scottish Government, but rather produced its own guidance, which is in accordance with the Supreme Court judgment and places an emphasis on biological sex as opposed to gender identity. Why have other public bodies not done the same?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
We can do that. That is fine. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have a couple of questions. Minister, in its submission to the committee, Murray Blackburn Mackenzie warned that
“Scottish public authorities are failing to meet their existing obligations in relation to protections for women and girls”
and that
“Failure to get the law right here carries a cost to the public purse”
because it
“is likely that more cases will be brought against Scottish public bodies.”
We have seen that in relation to the Sandie Peggie case, For Women Scotland’s lodging of legal action regarding school and prison guidance and the case of the Darlington nurses in England. Is MBM wrong to say that failure to properly implement the law could lead to more legal battles and, therefore, more taxpayer money being wasted?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Minister, it is good to hear that you accept the judgment and that you want to follow the law. However, it has recently emerged that SNP ministers have issued a declaration of incompatibility with regard to the Supreme Court’s judgment for the For Women Scotland case. Why is the Scottish Government seeking to undermine the law by putting the rights of dangerous criminals, who claim to be women, above the rights of some of the most vulnerable women?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It is quite detailed, but it is important to understand if the Scottish Government is breaking the law.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, convener. I have one question and then a supplementary. John, you said in response to my colleague Tess White that the EHRC sent an updated code of practice for services, public functions and associations to the UK Government following the Supreme Court judgment in the For Women Scotland case. Has there been any further update from the UK Government and has there been any engagement with the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes, I am asking whether the commission has changed its position.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Do you have a timetable for that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Do you also understand that you cannot compare apples and pears and that there are some things that you cannot provide services for if you do not have the correct data? Basically, self-ID will screw up the data, especially when it comes to ethnic minorities—people like me. How will you know if females from an ethnic minority are being discriminated against in any way if data on biological sex is not captured? If you use self-ID, people will not have the exact data and would not know what is happening. You talked about the pay gap and other things. Do you not agree that self-ID would muddy the waters?
11:00