The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 671 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
The Verity house agreement states that
“the default position will be no ring-fencing or direction of funding”.
As we heard from the previous panel, ring fencing has put a strain on council budgets. It was also made clear by the earlier witnesses from COSLA and local authorities that decisions should be made locally by local government and not by the Scottish Government. What progress has been made on that approach since last year’s budget? Should we expect there to be less direct spending in this year’s budget?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
On the previous panel, one of the witnesses from a local authority mentioned that some of the ring-fenced funding is not sufficient for councils to deliver on some of their priorities. Are you aware of that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have one more question. It has recently become public that the new UK Government has paused the £70 million rural growth deal for Argyll and Bute, leaving it as the only part of Scotland without such a deal in place. Last week, witnesses told the committee that the decision was “outrageous”. This week, witnesses have expressed their disappointment, and I know that the local community in Argyll and Bute feels the same. What impact do you expect that decision to have on the area? What steps is the Scottish Government taking to mitigate that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. Your submission states that the use of ring fencing puts further pressure on councils, which are
“legally required to set a balanced budget”.
Are councillors confident that we will see further reductions in ring fencing this year? Also, does COSLA believe that there are any good reasons for ring fencing of funding? Katie Hagmann said that good engagement is going on right now between the Scottish Government and local government, so it would be good to hear from you about whether there are good reasons for ring fencing, as well.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have a quick supplementary on teacher numbers. When I spoke to 31 local authorities, one of the issues that came up was ring fencing and teacher numbers, but I have also heard from COSLA and the Scottish Government that a piece of work is being done to have a look at that and see whether changes can be made. Are you aware of that work and, if so, can you give us an update on it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
My next question is for COSLA. Its submission blames the council tax freeze for the pressure on council budgets. How confident are the witnesses that the Scottish Government will not try to implement another council tax freeze next year? If it did so, what would be the financial implications for local government?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It does. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, convener. Last week, it became public knowledge that the UK Government had opposed the £70 million rural growth deal for Argyll and Bute, which leaves it being the only part of Scotland without such a deal in place. The deal was of great importance to Argyll and Bute because it included housing, developments and facilities for business and tourism. What impact might the pausing of the deal have on the area? What steps do witnesses suggest the Scottish Government should take to mitigate that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. It is the Mercat group’s view that the Scottish Government’s decision to freeze council tax had an impact on the financial sustainability of councils. I ask the witnesses to explain that statement. Local authority executives expressed concerns to me—I have met with 31 councils—that the freeze pushed their budgets to the limit. What would be the impact on local government finances if a similar policy were to be pursued next year?