The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I will explore that to clarify the point. Are you saying that the bill needs fundamental reform rather than just amendment? Does the Government need to reconsider the approach?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I welcome the cabinet secretary’s undertaking to do that further work.
Does she also recognise the concerns that have been raised around general resourcing challenges and how the work will involve a demand on capacity and resources that are already stretched, particularly coming back to the point about front-line practitioners? What discussions is she having with ministerial colleagues around future budget planning and the need for increased capacity?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Do any other witnesses want to comment on the issue more broadly?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I am keen to understand some of the issues around the complexities and concerns that have been raised with us by the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Social Work Scotland and others. Social Work Scotland described the amendments as “potentially impossible” to navigate in this landscape. There have been calls from front-line workers, who will have to interpret and work through the legislation, for sector-specific guidance. First, what work is being done on guidance in general, as outlined in the bill? Secondly, is the cabinet secretary open to the development of sector-specific guidance for practitioners?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I recognise a lot of what you have said about the progress made on standards 1 to 5 and the challenges with standards 6 to 10. Is there a feeling that standards 1 to 5 were slightly more straightforward because they are about changing culture, attitudes and approaches, but that 6 to 10 will be more challenging because they involve implementation and delivery? I noticed that you mentioned timescales. Are you committed to 2025 as the point by which all 10 standards should be implemented?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I apologise to you, convener, and to colleagues for having to come late to the meeting. I am interested in the MAT standards, which have been touched on in other questions. I think that it is fair to say that Public Health Scotland’s recent benchmarking report found progress to be patchy, and challenges were identified in that it is a bit of a postcode lottery when it comes to what is happening in different parts of the country. Will the minister speak to progress on the MAT standards and to why she thinks that that outcome is patchy at the moment?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Paul O'Kane
I would like to hear COSLA’s position, as it differs slightly from what we heard earlier this morning.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Paul O'Kane
I want to get a sense of what might be a way forward. Dr Tickell, at the time of the outcome of the Supreme Court case, you commented on the opportunity that the ruling might present to look at Scottish acts in terms of some of the things that we are talking about. I appreciate what you said in your previous answer about the complications surrounding all this, but do you have a view of what would be the most appropriate way forward?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning, and thank you for providing a helpful overview. I am going to ask questions about legal complexities, and about some of the views that have been shared by other organisations that we will hear from this morning.
The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and Social Work Scotland have both indicated that the legal complexities that will be created following the amendments will be challenging. Indeed, Social Work Scotland told us that it viewed it as a “potentially impossible legislative landscape” to navigate. We have heard quite clearly from all of you in evidence that the approach that is being taken is the only option. What do you think that the impact will be on duty bearers under the bill? How can we help them to navigate and address those complexities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Paul O'Kane
In the previous answer from Dr Tickell, we started to touch on the audits and the difficult debate that exists in that space. Earlier, a number of witnesses, including the children’s commissioner, spoke about the approach that they would like to see, not least looking together at the sort of audit approach that they would like. Obviously, COSLA had a different view, to some extent. Dr Tickell, will you comment on the principle of audits and on what, in your view, might happen in that space? Then I will come to Councillor Buchanan on the COSLA point.